<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new &#8220;monkey&#8221; trials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2003/04/07/the-new-monkey-trials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2003/04/07/the-new-monkey-trials/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2003/04/07/the-new-monkey-trials/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 15:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=51#comment-13</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Big Bang (the only explosion that ever created order and beauty) puts the lie to the eternal universe and the "matter is the only thing that matters" folks can't stand it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Now that is just pure conjecture.  First of all, order and beauty are being defined by you, someone who lives in this universe.  A visitor from another universe might find it horribly unordered and ugly as sin.  But that's beside the point.  You have no way of knowing that the big bang was the only time a universe with functioning life was created.  He may have happened millions of time.  The universe may shrink back and explode again and again.  Maybe it creates life once every 10 billion tries.&lt;blockquote&gt;The odds that the universe and everything in it came about by chance are as miniscule as the odds that the materialists will ever admit they could be wrong!&lt;/blockquote&gt;Me thinks you do not understand statisics and probability.  That's the reason I hate dealing with creationists so much; they simply do not understand the arguements against their ideas.  The universe is so vast and things happen on such a large time scale that just about everything that can happen will happen (and heisenberg says that anything is possible).  That doesn't even take into account other universes that could exist, hyperspace, and previous or future universes.  It doesn't matter how low the odds are when space and time both approach infinity the chance that something will happen always becomes 100%.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Big Bang (the only explosion that ever created order and beauty) puts the lie to the eternal universe and the &#8220;matter is the only thing that matters&#8221; folks can&#8217;t stand it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now that is just pure conjecture.  First of all, order and beauty are being defined by you, someone who lives in this universe.  A visitor from another universe might find it horribly unordered and ugly as sin.  But that&#8217;s beside the point.  You have no way of knowing that the big bang was the only time a universe with functioning life was created.  He may have happened millions of time.  The universe may shrink back and explode again and again.  Maybe it creates life once every 10 billion tries.<br />
<blockquote>The odds that the universe and everything in it came about by chance are as miniscule as the odds that the materialists will ever admit they could be wrong!</p></blockquote>
<p>Me thinks you do not understand statisics and probability.  That&#8217;s the reason I hate dealing with creationists so much; they simply do not understand the arguements against their ideas.  The universe is so vast and things happen on such a large time scale that just about everything that can happen will happen (and heisenberg says that anything is possible).  That doesn&#8217;t even take into account other universes that could exist, hyperspace, and previous or future universes.  It doesn&#8217;t matter how low the odds are when space and time both approach infinity the chance that something will happen always becomes 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2003/04/07/the-new-monkey-trials/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 04:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=51#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I'm with Einstein. The more I know about science, the more I believe in God. The Big Bang (the only explosion that ever created order and beauty) puts the lie to the eternal universe and the "matter is the only thing that matters" folks can't stand it. The odds that the universe and everything in it came about by chance are as miniscule as the odds that the materialists will ever admit they could be wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Einstein. The more I know about science, the more I believe in God. The Big Bang (the only explosion that ever created order and beauty) puts the lie to the eternal universe and the &#8220;matter is the only thing that matters&#8221; folks can&#8217;t stand it. The odds that the universe and everything in it came about by chance are as miniscule as the odds that the materialists will ever admit they could be wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2003/04/07/the-new-monkey-trials/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=51#comment-11</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But I do wonder, how educated are you on the evidence found by scientist and historians that lean to or, in my mind, prove creation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is there any? All the scientific evidence I've seen that "supports" creationism is actually geared toward poking holes in evolution. Proving evolution wrong doesn't mean that creationism is right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But I do wonder, how educated are you on the evidence found by scientist and historians that lean to or, in my mind, prove creation.</p></blockquote>
<p>Is there any? All the scientific evidence I&#8217;ve seen that &#8220;supports&#8221; creationism is actually geared toward poking holes in evolution. Proving evolution wrong doesn&#8217;t mean that creationism is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gibson</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2003/04/07/the-new-monkey-trials/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 01:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=51#comment-10</guid>
		<description>First of all, I'll state my position on the subject.  I believe in creation.  I like your article, very informative and a strong point of view.  After reading your article, I agree that creationism is not a part of science.  Maybee history is its' place.  But I do wonder, how educated are you on the evidence found by scientist and historians that lean to or, in my mind, prove creation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I&#8217;ll state my position on the subject.  I believe in creation.  I like your article, very informative and a strong point of view.  After reading your article, I agree that creationism is not a part of science.  Maybee history is its&#8217; place.  But I do wonder, how educated are you on the evidence found by scientist and historians that lean to or, in my mind, prove creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
