Looks like Bush and Ashcroft have lost another battle to have Genesis placed in science classes :

The Bush administration has stepped back from a another clash over religion’s place in society, as the Justice Department quietly dropped a probe of a university professor who is actively promoting Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution.

What nobody seems to be mentioning about this story is that the professor’s guidelines never mention the word “evolution” at all. The question students are asked to answer is “How do you account for the scientific origin of the human species?” If creationism was a valid scientific theory like its proponents claim it is, then they shouldn’t have any problem answering this question. The fact that they can’t answer it is just further proof of why creationism has no place in science education.

Another thing that deserves mention is the fact that the headline uses the term “Darwinist”. What the hell?! It’s obvious that the writer of this article buys into the whole bullshit creationist argument that evolution is as much a religious theory as creationism is. I wonder if they refer to teachers who are “actively promoting” the law of gravity as “Newtonists”?

Finally, why is the justice department wasting its time opening up inquiries into science professors refusing to write letters of recommendation for students who don’t understand science? Don’t they have some cancer patients to throw in jail or something?

I know Democrats are usually the party against term limits, but this is insane :

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

Resolved by the senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

`Article–

`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.’.

Time Magazine has three questions that Bush should answer as soon as he stops patting himself on the back : “Where is Saddam?”, “Who’s in Charge?”, & “Where are the weapons?”

For months before the war began, everyone from Bush on down argued that Saddam’s arsenal of biological and chemical weapons was so dangerous that destroying it was worth a war. They laid claim to information so certain that Colin Powell was able to provide graphic details to a U.N. audience in February. Pentagon officials were confident that the quality of their intelligence would lead troops to the illicit stockpiles fairly quickly once U.S. boots were on Iraqi soil. Now they’re adjusting the picture: the Pentagon says its soldiers are no more likely to stumble over a weapons cache than top U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix was. “Things were mobile. Things were underground. Things were in tunnels. Things were hidden. Things were dispersed. Now, are we going to find that? No, it’s a big country,” Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said last week. “The inspectors didn’t find anything, and I doubt that we will?what we will do is find the people who will tell us.”

However sanguine officials sound in public, in private the pressure is rising. The Pentagon dispatched an entire brigade?3,000 troops?to the search and offered $200,000 bounties for any weapons of mass destruction (WMD) uncovered. Local officers were authorized to make payments of $2,500 on the spot. “The White House is screaming, ‘Find me some WMD,’” says a State Department official, adding that the task is one of many suddenly facing the department. Members of the Administration must feel a new bond with Blix, since they are now the ones arguing that these things take time.

In light of the Sen. Rick Santorum’s comments equating consensual gay sex with incest, polygamy, and adultery, Kevin (of Calpundit) thinks this could be a good “wedge issue” for the Democrats :

I really think the Democrats could make some electoral hay with gay rights as a (secondary) campaign issue. There are just so many horribly bigoted comments about gays from Republican politicians ? comments that go much further than even some conservative voters are willing to tolerate. If it becomes a campaign issue, they are forced to either repudiate the bigots, which will lose them part of their core constituency, or else stay silent, which might well break off a chunk of their moderate supporters. Surely someone can figure out how to run with this?

Personally, I think gay rights is still too divisive an issue to make it a primary or secondary issue. In the midwest and south, homosexuality is still seen by many people as immoral. Rather than campaign on an issue that (1) could possibly scare away as many undecided voters as it could attract and (2) is already one in which the differences between Democrats and Republicans is perfectly clear, I think the Democrats best bet is to combine the Santorum issue with Trent Lott’s comments last December and try to paint the Republican party as the party of intolerance and bigotry. These kinds of Freudian slips on the part of Republicans are common enough that they aren’t much of a surprise anymore. If the Democrats would bring them all back up and put a new spin on them (to avoid being accused of bringing up “old news”), there’s no telling what kind of damage they would inflict on the Republicans chances of courting moderates. Of course with shows like “Will and Grace” being big hits, I could be vastly underestimating the tolerance of the American public.

Despite what the Bush Administration wants us to believe, the failures that led up to the events of 9/11 weren’t a problem with the gathering of intelligence, but rather the analysis of evidence that had already been gathered. Although the investigation of these failures has begun, it is being criminally underfunded. The $3 million allocated may seem like a lot, but it’s nothing compared to the $50 million probe into the space shuttle disaster or the $65 million to probe Bill Clinton’s marital problems. Testimony only begun a couple weeks ago, but already fingers are being pointed at the the FAA, NORAD, the INS, and the SEC :

On the Chicago Board Options Exchange during the week before September 11, put options were purchased on American and United Airlines, the two airlines involved in the attacks. The investors who placed these orders were gambling that, in the short term, the stock prices of both airlines would plummet. Never before on the Chicago Exchange were such large amounts of United and American Airlines options traded. These investors netted a profit of at least $5 million after the September 11 attacks.

But the FBI and CIA aren’t in the clear either. There were countless warnings that were ignored prior to 9/11. The sensible thing to do in a situation like this would be to admit there were intelligence failures and launch a massive independent investigation to find out the weaknesses in the system. Instead we got Tom Ridge’s color chart, PATRIOT Act’s 1 & (possibly) 2, and the wars in Iraq & (possibly) Syria. Am I the only one who’s been wondering how things would be if (as Robin Cook put it) “the hanging chads in Florida had gone the other way”?

Pat Robertson has a few words to say about Syria (aka. the Sammy Hagar of the Axis of Evil) :

Did you know that Pat Robertson can leg-press 1500 pounds! How does he do it? Where does Pat find the time and energy to host a daily, national TV show, head a world-wide ministry, develop visionary scholars, while traveling the globe as a statesman?

Whoops, wrong quote. That was from a page about Pat’s Age-Defying Shakes (Not to be confused with his Age-Defying Protein Pancakes) Pat’s musings about Syria are here :

Syria is a creation of one of the big powers just like Iraq was. Iraq was a keystroke of Winston Churchill. He formed Iraq. It used to be Mesopotamia. And now it’s Iraq. And the same thing with Syria. There was a big fight over whether the British or the French would get it, and the French got it. Syria has a ba’athist regime just like Saddam Hussein.

Third grade sentence structure aside, Pat’s contention is that the invasion of Syria will somehow fulfill a Biblical prophecy. Of course like every other prophecy in the Bible, his “evidence” is quoted out of context and is really sketchy. I’m sure this will be used as the latest evidance that the Bible is full of prophecies and that Jesus is the fulfillment of those prophecies (despite the mountain of evidence to the contrary). The Old and New Testaments have been bundled together for many hundreds of years and the authors of the New Testament were clearly writing a book whose goal was to fulfill the percieved prophecies of the Old Testament. There’s nothing prophetical about that. Maybe Pat Robertson needs to learn the word “foreshadowing”.

And speaking of Pat, how are fundies not able to put two and two together and see the clear paralells between televangelism and the story of Jesus getting pissed at the money changers in the temple? The money changers weren’t Coinstar machines, they were assholes like Pat trying to make money off religious people. By the way, you can go to Pat Robertson’s site and get the great new book “The Bible Cure for Candida & Yeast Infections”.

I just got a tip from a friend of mine who was watching CNN that on Inside Politics they illustrated a piece on the senate presidential candidates by using a deck of cards. I’m going to keep an eye on CNN’s transcript page until they post the transcript of today’s show. This isn’t like John Kerry making a reference to regime change, this is a major news outlet drawing a comparison between senate leaders and wanted war criminals (the ones in Iraq, not the ones in the White House). You can email Judy Woodruff’s boss here and let him know what you think of this one-sided bullshit they call “news”. Like Alterman says, “What Liberal Media?”

PETA have once again pissed off a bunch of people in the hopes of getting attention. This time they’ve attracted the ire of Christian leaders for their Easter ad that features a picture of Jesus with his halo replaced with an orange slice under the heading “Jesus was the prince of peas” :

But Rabbi David Ostrich of Temple Beth-el, said historical evidence indicates that Jesus, like other Jews of the time, was a meat eater. He said a ritual part of the Passover meal was a lamb slaughtered in the Temple in Jerusalem.

I guess we can put this one in the same file as “French fries are from Belgium”.

Remember this the next time a liberal is blamed for waging “class war” when criticizing the president : American Airlines has been facing the possibility of bankruptcy recently. In order to cut costs and prevent layoffs, they’ve been trying to convince their workers to take a pay cut between 15 and 23 percent. The day after most of the unions approved pay cuts, it was revealed that the top executives had been hiding plans to secure millions of dollars in bonuses for themselves. The company has responded to the outrage by saying the executive bonuses were “necessary to prevent senior executives from taking better offers elsewhere”. What the hell?! Why would the airline want to reward the people who are responsible for the airline’s failure in the first place? They shouldn’t be given more money. They should be tarred and feathered. Of course now the company is saying they’re backing away from the bonus program, but considering the millions these executives make in salaries, stock options, and pensions, that’s not saying much. It still doesn’t excuse the deceptive tactics management was willing to go to in order to screw their employees without actually having to make any sacrifices themselves. Why is it that an executive that works at a failing company is still treated like the goose who laid the golden egg while his/her employees are expected to pay for this failed leadership in the form of pay cuts, benefit reductions, and layoffs?

Did you guys hear the one about Saddam Hussein starring in a gay porn film?

In the newly uncovered 86-minute prison flick, Saddam, then just 34, plays a naive young peasant who is wrongly convicted and sent to jail. He is initiated into homosexuality by a series of older and more experienced cons.

“Saddam’s acting in the picture is actually quite good,” al-Sabah notes. “One scene, in which he buries his face in a pillow and cries, is so touching you almost can forget you’re watching a low-budget sexploitation film.”

This is obviously fake (courtesy of the Weekly World News), but that didn’t stop some fools from actually believing it’s true. Then again, if George Bush can convince Americans that he’s interested in liberating the Iraqi people, then I guess they can be convinced of anything.

Well, I finally removed the Iraq Body count because a) we’ll probably never know how many civilians were killed and b) our goverment obviously doesn’t care enough to even count the number of innocent people they killed. Iraq Body Count’s numbers were based on reports from the media and we all know how reliable the embeded reporters have been. As great as IBC has been, I think we’re likely to get much more reliable information in the months to come from the Red Cross, UN, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the World health Organization :

“At the moment in Iraq the biggest public health problem is the level of civilian causalties, there is no question about that,” Iain Simpson, a spokesman for the World Health Organisation (WHO) told journalists Friday.

“The reports from Baghdad, Karbala and Hilla are very worrying indeed,” he said, insisting that aid agencies needed access to Iraq to help the wounded.

I bet humanitarian relief would go much more smoothly if the U.S. military would spend more time cleaning up all the unexploded cluster bomb shells before they kill any more kids and less time blocking access to people in need :

U.S. forces have refused a Save the Children plane permission to land in northern Iraq to deliver aid, breaching the Geneva Convention and “costing children their lives,” the British aid agency said on Thursday.

Save the Children said in a statement it had been trying for more than a week to land a plane in Arbil carrying enough medical supplies to treat 40,000 people and emergency feeding kits for malnourished children.

A U.S. official told the charity no aid flights would be allowed until the area was safe but the U.N. has already declared Arbil a “safe and secure” area, the charity said.

When the Murray, Utah city council decided they wanted to have a prayer at city meetings, rather than fight the policy on constitutional grounds, a local atheist decided to test the limits of this new religious policy. When Tom Snyder wasn’t allowed to say his prayer, he took them to court :

He and his lawyer have been pursuing the lawsuit since 1994, when Snyder filed a lawsuit in federal court against the Salt Lake City suburb for allowing other pre-meeting prayers but refusing to let him offer a prayer addressed to “Our Mother, who art in heaven.”

Among other things, the prayer asked for deliverance “from the evil of forced religious worship now sought to be imposed upon the people … by the actions of misguided, weak and stupid politicians, who abuse power in their own self-righteousness.”

Focus on the Family, one of the most outspoken anti-gay groups this side of Rev. Phelps, is slashing its budget by $5 million and laying of employees. Among other things, they’re one of the groups that likes to promote the insane notion that gays can be “cured”. It’s too bad nobody has found a cure for “self-righteous asshole” yet :

?Love Won Out? an FOC sponsored program that claims to convert gays to heterosexuality has been scaled back. The program, discredited by psychiatrists, has traveled across the US and Canada over the past year but attracted only small audiences.

Earlier this week FOC announced John Paulk who had headed up its Homosexuality and Gender Department, was leaving the ministry but did not say why. Today a source at the ministry did not deny that FOC’s money troubles was a large part of the reason.

Paulk who was touted for years as a successful example that gays can be ‘cured’ led FOC’s ex-gay movement. Three years ago though he was spotted and photographed in a well known Washington gay bar. The ensuing publicity led to his removal as chairman of ex-gay group Exodus although he retained a key post at FOC until this week.

Fred Phelps (of godhatesfags.com, godhatesamerica.com, and various funeral protests) has a couple new crusades :

We’ve been [up to New York] three times since Sept. 11 picketing with big signs that say “Thank God For Sept. 11″ and that the FDNY is a fag fire department because they’re laced with fags and their fag agenda and their chaplain was fag priest named Mychal Judge. And any outfit that’s that dumb or evil — I mean an out-of-the closet fag priest?! And they bragged about it! And they need to be picketed. And they’re not heroes and we got signs that say all that. When St. Patrick’s Cathedral was honoring them on a Sunday not long after Sept. 11 and they had all those fire trucks lined up there and they’re praising them to the high heavens then we were over there with signs saying that they’re not heroes and they’re all bound for hell. Now, that’s the way you preach.

Well, I don’t know if [Mr. Rogers was] gay or not but he’s one of the foremost proponents of ‘It’s OK to be Gay.’ And from the church he got ordained by and the Presbyterian church he goes to in Pittsburgh which is one of the few boldly fag-promoting churches, that’s one of the few.

You’ve got a guy (Mr. Rogers) who has got millions of children’s ears and he says he’s gonna shoot straight to them about the weighty matters of life, death, divorce — and then he steps gingerly around the fact that if you mess with that fag lifestyle you gonna split hell wide open.

Look, he went straight to hell. If everybody in the world is holding some candlelight vigil and catawalling about what a wonderful guy he was using the event of his death to preach propaganda lies from the devil and hell, why should it seem strange for an old time Baptist preacher to say ‘Wait a moment please?”?

He’s in hell. And if you’re putting out cartoons depicting that he’s in heaven, you’ve got no basis for it. Do you want to make the argument that he’s in heaven?

Needless to say, the views of Fred Phelps are another example of people taking religion too seriously. Although the mainstream (ie. sane, normal, loving, etc.) religious folks would argue that the religious fervor of Fred Phelps (and his spiritual brethren the KKK) is based on misinterpretation of the bible, it seems to me that Phelps is doing what any other religious leader does : taking parts of the bible literally and out of context in order to further their own religious goals.

There is no definitive interpretation of the bible. God never sent Moses down the mountain with a study guide (or a translation guide for that matter). It’s ludicrous to think that a book that has many different authors and was written thousands of years ago would have a specific interpretation. If the bible can’t even get the details of the crucifixion correct (Did Jesus or Simon carry the cross? What was written on the sign on the cross? What time was Jesus crucified? What were Jesus’s last words?), then why is it proclaimed to be the literal word of god by its followers? For a book that’s hundreds of pages long, it’s rare to see more than 2-3 lines being quoted at a time. Of course the reason for this is there’s enough crazy bullshit in the bible to support any radical agenda.