Sizing up the candidates
Well, today is the first day of Moveon.org’s virtual primary. If you’re a member of their mailing list, take a few minutes to research the candidates and pick your favorite. After giving the issue some serious thought, I put down my vote for Howard Dean.
All things being equal, I like the positions of Dennis Kucinich above all the other candidates. As JoeF pointed out, he’s definitely the most progressive of the bunch :
- Kucinich is doing something that a liberal hasn’t done in a while…he’s running a truly progressive campaign, with a well thought out and well articulated point of view. We, as progressives, should support that.
Many, many people bitch about the DNC moving towards the center. But then they go and vote for a guy who’s willing to move towards the center (like Kerry, Gephardt, or Dean). If you really want to force the DNC to move back to the left, you should be supporting Kucinich. He’s the only one with a strong progressive agenda, and the more support he gets, the more the DNC will have to come to terms with the unhappiness most of us have with their centrist moves.
Although I agree, I think that’s only half the equation in a case like this. Just as important as the candidate’s views (at least in a case where most of the candidates are pretty good) is whether the candidate can get elected and how willing he/she is to comprimise in order to get some work done.
As much as I like Kucinich, he’s so outwardly liberal that he’ll turn off a lot of moderate voters. Even in the one-in-a-million chance that he could get elected, I have serious doubts about his ability to enact his agenda. At least one or both of the houses of congress are going to be Republican after 2004. If the senate president doesn’t know when to hold em’ and know when to fold em’, then it’s not gonna do anybody any good.
So that’s why I like Howard Dean. I don’t agree with him some of the issues, but I haven’t been this excited about a candidate since Al Gore whooped up on Bush in the 2000 debates (Seriously, watch them again and you can count how many questions Bush actually answers on one hand). The thing that really sold me on Dean was this quote :
- “White folks in the South driving with Confederate decals on the back of pickup trucks ought to be voting with us, not them, because their kids don’t have health insurance either.”
That one says more about Dean’s inclusiveness than a thousand conerned speeches about “the black vote”. One of the big problems that liberals face is that we’ve been labeled as insincere and elitist by the conservative press. I think there’s definitely something to it, but when given the choice between politicians who talk down to minorities and politicians who openly screw minorities, the choice is pretty clear. Dean has shown that he can cut through the perception of the liberal snob and really appeal to moderates.
3 comments
Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


I actually updated my argument some today, in this post
Voting Kucinich in the MoveOn primary won’t hurt Kerry or Gephardt in the slightest (they don’t need the money), and it won’t hurt Dean much (he’s doing pretty good, money wise, from what I’ve heard). Voting Kucinich in your local primary may be a problem, but voting for him here will send a pretty strong message to the DNC, and at the same time, give Kucinich the ability to get onto a national stage and start putting true progressive viewpoints into the debate. He could be like the Anti-Pat Buchanon.
Comment by JoeF — June 24, 2003 @ 5:32 pm
It basically comes down to this: Is that the person you want representing the Democratic Party?
Comment by Earnest — June 25, 2003 @ 11:19 am
While I can appreciate your concerns about a candidates electability, and his ability to enact an agenda once in a position to do so, there are a couple of thoughts to keep in mind. In opting for a candidate who you do not agree with on most or all issues, aren’t you making the fundamental mistake of compromise that we so desperately need to steer clear from in order to enact changes toward a better future? What good does it do to support a candidate who avoids any passionate commitment only because he stands a better chance of getting elected? This country needs to wake up…we all need to look in the mirror and decide that rather than let another carbon copy corporatist into the white house, we will elect someone who cares about the people, about positive and peace-seeking changes for the citizens of this great democracy. A Dean in the white house now will translate into another republican being elected in four years, and nothing drastic will ever happen. Only continued restrictions of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. A Kucinich in the white house, on the other hand, might actually move us into a direction long ago hoped for by our founding fathers. Peace…a happy, content, and safe people who get to EXPERIENCE their ability to have a voice in the government that is to serve them. Finally we are being offered a REAL choice…let’s take that leap of faith and choose the real, sincere, and honest candidate…Dennis Kucinich is the light in this dark hour.
Comment by steveH — July 4, 2003 @ 12:04 am