The Howard and Wesley Show

Whew! It’s been a busy day for the Dean and (potential) Clark campaigns. First there was the news that Clark might join Dean’s ticket :

senate presidential candidate Howard Dean has asked retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark to join his campaign, if the former NATO (news – web sites) commander does not jump into the race himself next week, and the two men discussed the vice presidency at a weekend meeting in California, sources familiar with the discussions said.

Clark, in a telephone interview yesterday, said he did not want to comment about the private meeting. Asked about reports that the two men had discussed a wide range of issues, including endorsing Dean, joining the campaign, possible roles in a Dean administration and the vice presidency, he said only, “It was a complete tour of the horizon.”
. . .
While it would represent a gamble for both men to team up so early in the campaign, such a move would rattle an already unpredictable nomination campaign. Dean and Clark have two things in common that if combined could prove formidable among senate voters: They both opposed the war in Iraq, and both are generating excitement on the Internet and with grass-roots activists.

A few hours later, the news was that Clark was going to run for president himself :

Retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark has told friends he is likely to become the 10th senate presidential candidate, a move that could shake up the crowded field just four months before the first ballots are cast.

Clark, 58, has not made a decision, but the Arkansas resident is aggressively recruiting campaign staff and plans to announce his intentions next week, friends and party officials said on condition of anonymity. His earliest allies would be from former President Clinton’s Arkansas-based political network.

By the end of the day, there was a new twist on the story. According to Josh Marshall and U.S. News, the Dean/Clark story was part of a “dirty tricks” campaign by Dean’s supporters :

And forget about that talk that all the retired four-star general and former NATO boss wants is the veep nomination. Supporters say that’s a dirty-tricks campaign pushed by rival Howard Dean who’s scared of a Clark candidacy. Says Frisby: “Wes Clark firmly believes that he is the best choice to be president, not be vice president or hold any other government post.”

I’m not sure if the whole Dean/Clark story was “dirty tircks” or not, but if it was, Dean better be careful. With all the attention that Clark is sure to get, the last think that Dean wants is Clark publicly bashing him for fighting dirty.


posted by greg on September 12, 2003 @ 1:50 am

6 comments

  1. Man, I was so excited about a Dean/Clark ticket. I hope it’s not just a rumor. They’d be a great match, I think.

    Comment by Kyle — September 12, 2003 @ 10:08 am

  2. I totally agree. I think they’d compliment each other very well. There was a really great examination of this over at Not Geniuses. Pundits have been falling all over themselves trying to predict how a Clark candidacy would hurt Dean or Kerry. I’m not sure how much effect it would have, but the one thing Clark’s entry would surely do is add a lot of credibility to all the anti-war candidates.

    Comment by greg — September 12, 2003 @ 10:33 am

  3. I agree, who better to attack what Bush has done in Iraq (meaning, what he hasn’t done in Iraq) than a former NATO general who helped clean up Bosnia. Clark would easily deflect some of the “negative things” that Republicans seems to say about Democrats. You hate America, things like that. I don’t think that would work against Clark.

    Comment by Clayton — September 12, 2003 @ 11:25 am

  4. What many people don’t know about Clark’s military record is a lot! Please take a moment to read a note-worthy article through the attached link:

    http://www.thenation.com/edcut/index.mhtml?bid=7

    Dean could do better. So could America.

    Comment by Sean Diego — September 15, 2003 @ 10:55 am

  5. Am i the only one who thinks Dean is completely unelectable? I’m a big supporter, don’t get me wrong, but in electing someone who is anti-Iraqi war and always has been, the majority of Americans will have to admit they were wrong from the beginning– I don’t see it happening

    Comment by Erin — September 15, 2003 @ 2:20 pm

  6. If anything, I think Dean is the most electible of the group. Sure, most Americans still think there’s a link between Iraq and 9/11, but most Americans are also worried about the lack of WMDs. Also, most polls now cite the economy as a greater concern among likely voters than Iraq or homeland security. What most pundits seem to be forgeting is that Dean is one of the most centrist people running. Sure, he’s to the left of someone like Lieberman, but he’s still pro-gun and pro-death penalty.

    Comment by greg — September 15, 2003 @ 2:50 pm

Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.