“Lieberman is a goddamn crack smoker.”

‘Nuff said.

then you must be smoking the same crack that Lieberman’s smoking because voting for Bush is a vote AGAINST education.

I believe there is more than enough money ear marked for defense. What we need are smarter people deciding what to do with that money. Does building $120 million F-22 fighters make me safer? What do they have to shoot down besides obsolete MiG’s? Couldn’t we have just bought the “bargin” JSF for 35 million? Are the terrorists really planning on shooting a missle at us? Is that why we need a missle shield? We already have the best military equipment in the world. We have more than enough military intelligence. If we weren’t busy stationing troops all over the world we’d have more than enough personnel. What we need is better trained and better motivated intelligence and soldiers. For example if we bought those Joint Strike Fighters instead of the F-22’s we could afford to give every soldier a $42000 raise. Not that I would suggest doing that. But you could use that money to increase their training, saleries, benifits, etc. Throwing money at the problem is never the solution. Being smart is.

Terrorists are bad, I know, but you have a much greater chance of slipping and dying in your bath tub then you do of getting killed by a terrorist. They can do a lot of damage, but I’m sure the next big hurricane, earthquake, or volcanic erruption will do more.

I much more concerned about facing the why’s behind terrorism then actually confronting it. Because just like the war on drugs you’re never going to stop it completly by fighting it… in fact you might just make it worse.

Lieberman has a consistency that I like. Back when Clinton was launching Desert Fox, he’d already ackowledged that Saddam had to go, and he’s had the courage of his convictions ever since. I want a democratic candidate who will act decisively to protect our interests and strengthen our defense. Lieberman and Edwards are the only candidates who show me that.

If Lieberman doesn’t get the nom, then I may have no choice but to vote for Bush. I don’t want to because I hate how beholden he is to making his tax cuts permanent, but lacking a Lieberman, that’s the way I’m going.

cant say i like kerry. if i was a reporter and had him in the crosshairs id want to know why a congressional report with his name on it that showed the secret government unconvered by the church report was still up to its old tricks, not to mention arms for hostages or the october surprise, produced few prosecutions which were quickly pardoned and business went on as usual. this bothers me. with ammunition like this he didnt put up more of a fight? troubles me.

edwards is my second behind kucinich too, if for nothing else he’s greener to the senate and hopefully less corrupted.

dean… as i said before dean folks are now talking about voting conviction and concience from a side of that argument they havent been on before. wonder how long itll be before they’re compared to naderites.

and joe’s gotta go. who are this 9% who voted for him?