<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hate The War, Love The Warrior</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:04:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwer</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-2610</link>
		<dc:creator>jwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 11:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=952#comment-2610</guid>
		<description>Yes, well, obviously I was engaging in some hyperbole; I don&#039;t think anyone&#039;s vote should be taken away for any reason (with the possible exception of &#039;while in prison&#039; if there were some way to prove that they were actually SUPPOSED to be there)... 

My point is that it&#039;s not acceptable to excuse people who can&#039;t be bothered to think critically, and just accept the mess we get into because they somehow think they should still exercise their vote. I am more angry, actually, at people who DO know what&#039;s what, and DON&#039;T vote, because they think it&#039;s a drop in the bucket or whatever rationalization they use to get out of a 20-minute duty every few years.

I wasn&#039;t actually disagreeing with your analysis of why he might not have known better, and for all I know, he did know better but just wanted to show his support; I put my hand over my heart and get annoyed at people that talk during the Anthem too, but there is a line, and being patriotic without knowing anything about the ideals of this country or about historic and contemporary abuses of those ideals is NOT worthy of excuse or respect.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, well, obviously I was engaging in some hyperbole; I don&#8217;t think anyone&#8217;s vote should be taken away for any reason (with the possible exception of &#8216;while in prison&#8217; if there were some way to prove that they were actually SUPPOSED to be there)&#8230; </p>
<p>My point is that it&#8217;s not acceptable to excuse people who can&#8217;t be bothered to think critically, and just accept the mess we get into because they somehow think they should still exercise their vote. I am more angry, actually, at people who DO know what&#8217;s what, and DON&#8217;T vote, because they think it&#8217;s a drop in the bucket or whatever rationalization they use to get out of a 20-minute duty every few years.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t actually disagreeing with your analysis of why he might not have known better, and for all I know, he did know better but just wanted to show his support; I put my hand over my heart and get annoyed at people that talk during the Anthem too, but there is a line, and being patriotic without knowing anything about the ideals of this country or about historic and contemporary abuses of those ideals is NOT worthy of excuse or respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 18:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=952#comment-2609</guid>
		<description>Okay, I&#039;m responding to a few different comments here :&lt;blockquote&gt;I fail to see why you should support the warriors, under these circumstances.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I wouldn&#039;t necessarily use the word &quot;support&quot;, but I think the root cause our soldiers are dying for is just, even if the wars themselves and specifics therein are not.&lt;blockquote&gt;Incidentally, in any army, you&#039;re only supposed to obey lawful orders. Obeying unlawful orders is a war crime. So is compelling troops to obey unlawful orders.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I agree. I exagerrated a bit on this point, but I did want to stress that if Tillman (or any other soldiers) disagree with this war, it&#039;s not like they can just go AWOL.&lt;blockquote&gt;Don&#039;t you think it&#039;s about time people stopped piling on Ted Rall for saying things they don&#039;t want to hear, and suggesting that he should be silenced or censored? Or do all freedoms have to be abandoned in the name of electing Mr. Kerry?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Huh?? Who&#039;s saying Rall should be censored? What does this have to do with John Kerry?&lt;blockquote&gt;Also, the excuse that &quot;some people don&#039;t read the Nation&quot; doesn&#039;t fly with me; if someone can&#039;t read between the lines, even on Fox fucking news, they should have their vote taken away&lt;/blockquote&gt;Sorry, but that&#039;s just wrong. Saying someone should have their vote taken away for being uninformed is as elitist as the conservatives who said that anyone who had trouble using a butterfly ballot in 2000 is &quot;too dumb to vote&quot;. If laziness is the reason for America being horribly misinformed, does this mean we can stop blaming media consolidation, FCC strong-arming, etc.?&lt;blockquote&gt;here&#039;s a question: why do we on the left criticise rall for his &quot;shock&quot; but look past michael moore&#039;s innacuarcy? or his shock?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Because Michael Moore doesn&#039;t intentionally say hurtful things just to see what kind of response they&#039;ll get. &lt;blockquote&gt;what about stern? everyone on the left loves him now but his attitude towards women and the whole &quot;homeless hollywood squares&quot; thing give me pause.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Well, we may share a common enemy with Stern, but in the end he&#039;s still a sleazy opportunist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;m responding to a few different comments here :<br />
<blockquote>I fail to see why you should support the warriors, under these circumstances.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily use the word &#8220;support&#8221;, but I think the root cause our soldiers are dying for is just, even if the wars themselves and specifics therein are not.<br />
<blockquote>Incidentally, in any army, you&#8217;re only supposed to obey lawful orders. Obeying unlawful orders is a war crime. So is compelling troops to obey unlawful orders.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree. I exagerrated a bit on this point, but I did want to stress that if Tillman (or any other soldiers) disagree with this war, it&#8217;s not like they can just go AWOL.<br />
<blockquote>Don&#8217;t you think it&#8217;s about time people stopped piling on Ted Rall for saying things they don&#8217;t want to hear, and suggesting that he should be silenced or censored? Or do all freedoms have to be abandoned in the name of electing Mr. Kerry?</p></blockquote>
<p>Huh?? Who&#8217;s saying Rall should be censored? What does this have to do with John Kerry?<br />
<blockquote>Also, the excuse that &#8220;some people don&#8217;t read the Nation&#8221; doesn&#8217;t fly with me; if someone can&#8217;t read between the lines, even on Fox fucking news, they should have their vote taken away</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry, but that&#8217;s just wrong. Saying someone should have their vote taken away for being uninformed is as elitist as the conservatives who said that anyone who had trouble using a butterfly ballot in 2000 is &#8220;too dumb to vote&#8221;. If laziness is the reason for America being horribly misinformed, does this mean we can stop blaming media consolidation, FCC strong-arming, etc.?<br />
<blockquote>here&#8217;s a question: why do we on the left criticise rall for his &#8220;shock&#8221; but look past michael moore&#8217;s innacuarcy? or his shock?</p></blockquote>
<p>Because Michael Moore doesn&#8217;t intentionally say hurtful things just to see what kind of response they&#8217;ll get.<br />
<blockquote>what about stern? everyone on the left loves him now but his attitude towards women and the whole &#8220;homeless hollywood squares&#8221; thing give me pause.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, we may share a common enemy with Stern, but in the end he&#8217;s still a sleazy opportunist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-2608</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=952#comment-2608</guid>
		<description>this cartoon is way over the top.  it says things that are uncalled for.  that being said, i still think some of ted cartoos are pretty funny.  heres no where near tom tomorrow, but still.

here&#039;s a question:  why do we on the left criticise rall for his &quot;shock&quot; but look past michael moore&#039;s innacuarcy?  or his shock?  what about stern?  everyone on the left loves him now but his attitude towards women and the whole &quot;homeless hollywood squares&quot; thing give me pause.

everyone on &quot;our side&quot; has thier faults and shortcommings (except amy goodman-don&#039;t no one talk trash on my woman!).  none of these people, including rall, are nearly as arrogant, mean, and shocking as the people in the whitehouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this cartoon is way over the top.  it says things that are uncalled for.  that being said, i still think some of ted cartoos are pretty funny.  heres no where near tom tomorrow, but still.</p>
<p>here&#8217;s a question:  why do we on the left criticise rall for his &#8220;shock&#8221; but look past michael moore&#8217;s innacuarcy?  or his shock?  what about stern?  everyone on the left loves him now but his attitude towards women and the whole &#8220;homeless hollywood squares&#8221; thing give me pause.</p>
<p>everyone on &#8220;our side&#8221; has thier faults and shortcommings (except amy goodman-don&#8217;t no one talk trash on my woman!).  none of these people, including rall, are nearly as arrogant, mean, and shocking as the people in the whitehouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwer</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-2607</link>
		<dc:creator>jwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 16:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=952#comment-2607</guid>
		<description>Greg: I agree almost totally with you (despite that it was my comment that made you post a rebuttal)... I think that including cheap shock value like &quot;do I get to kill Arabs&quot; is what keep Rall from being a controversial but necessary voice, and make him come off as an asshole. 

That said, I also agree with Ross and Josh about the fact that Bush and his ilk are perfectly happy for us to focus on individual tragedies at the expense of focusing on his craptacular administration; whether Tillman was a racist or not (I don&#039;t know), whether it&#039;s predictable for people to side with their leader or not (it is), Bush is &quot;an evildoer&quot; and the fact remains that none of these people would&#039;ve died if he hadn&#039;t been so upset that Saddam tried to kill his Pappy. 

Also, the excuse that &quot;some people don&#039;t read the Nation&quot; doesn&#039;t fly with me; if someone can&#039;t read between the lines, even on Fox fucking news, they should have their vote taken away... it is not up to those of us who know what&#039;s going on to live at the mercy of those who would rather watch Survivor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg: I agree almost totally with you (despite that it was my comment that made you post a rebuttal)&#8230; I think that including cheap shock value like &#8220;do I get to kill Arabs&#8221; is what keep Rall from being a controversial but necessary voice, and make him come off as an asshole. </p>
<p>That said, I also agree with Ross and Josh about the fact that Bush and his ilk are perfectly happy for us to focus on individual tragedies at the expense of focusing on his craptacular administration; whether Tillman was a racist or not (I don&#8217;t know), whether it&#8217;s predictable for people to side with their leader or not (it is), Bush is &#8220;an evildoer&#8221; and the fact remains that none of these people would&#8217;ve died if he hadn&#8217;t been so upset that Saddam tried to kill his Pappy. </p>
<p>Also, the excuse that &#8220;some people don&#8217;t read the Nation&#8221; doesn&#8217;t fly with me; if someone can&#8217;t read between the lines, even on Fox fucking news, they should have their vote taken away&#8230; it is not up to those of us who know what&#8217;s going on to live at the mercy of those who would rather watch Survivor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MFB</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-2606</link>
		<dc:creator>MFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 10:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=952#comment-2606</guid>
		<description>In a volunteer army, if you hate the war, you shouldn&#039;t be a warrior. I fail to see why you should support the warriors, under these circumstances.

Incidentally, in any army, you&#039;re only supposed to obey lawful orders. Obeying unlawful orders is a war crime. So is compelling troops to obey unlawful orders.

Don&#039;t you think it&#039;s about time people stopped piling on Ted Rall for saying things they don&#039;t want to hear, and suggesting that he should be silenced or censored? Or do all freedoms have to be abandoned in the name of electing Mr. Kerry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a volunteer army, if you hate the war, you shouldn&#8217;t be a warrior. I fail to see why you should support the warriors, under these circumstances.</p>
<p>Incidentally, in any army, you&#8217;re only supposed to obey lawful orders. Obeying unlawful orders is a war crime. So is compelling troops to obey unlawful orders.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you think it&#8217;s about time people stopped piling on Ted Rall for saying things they don&#8217;t want to hear, and suggesting that he should be silenced or censored? Or do all freedoms have to be abandoned in the name of electing Mr. Kerry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 01:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=952#comment-2605</guid>
		<description>&quot;there&#039;s no room in the military for low-level guys to be questioning their orders in the middle of a fight. Ever.&quot;

Jeez.  Ever?  He wasn&#039;t in the middle of a fight for the whole six months...  And I&#039;m not sure I agree with this reasoning anyway.  But &quot;ever&quot; is definitly overkill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;there&#8217;s no room in the military for low-level guys to be questioning their orders in the middle of a fight. Ever.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jeez.  Ever?  He wasn&#8217;t in the middle of a fight for the whole six months&#8230;  And I&#8217;m not sure I agree with this reasoning anyway.  But &#8220;ever&#8221; is definitly overkill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 23:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=952#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wish he hadn&#039;t phrased it so it looked like an attack on Tillman.&lt;/blockquote&gt;It didn&#039;t just &quot;look like&quot; an attack on Tillman, it &lt;i&gt;was &lt;/i&gt;an attack on Tillman. And an unfair one at that. His &quot;do I get to kill Arabs?&quot; line was so inappropriate I wouldn&#039;t blame any paper for permanently pulling his strip. 

I&#039;m also personally offended by the last panel of the strip that subtly implies that anyone who considers Tillman to be a hero is somehow blind to the wrongs of the Bush Administration. (My view on this is best summed up by the title of this post.) It&#039;s possible to decry the war and mourn the dead at the same time, but I guess that requires a level of complexity that Rall is incapable of.

This kind of strip is standard fare for Ted Rall though. While I have a lot in common with Rall politically, his motivation often seems to be to piss people off and get attention. I got over trying to use shock value as a persuasive tactic when I was fifteen, but apparently Rall (and his conservative doppelganger, Ann Coulter) never really grew up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wish he hadn&#8217;t phrased it so it looked like an attack on Tillman.</p></blockquote>
<p>It didn&#8217;t just &#8220;look like&#8221; an attack on Tillman, it <i>was </i>an attack on Tillman. And an unfair one at that. His &#8220;do I get to kill Arabs?&#8221; line was so inappropriate I wouldn&#8217;t blame any paper for permanently pulling his strip. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also personally offended by the last panel of the strip that subtly implies that anyone who considers Tillman to be a hero is somehow blind to the wrongs of the Bush Administration. (My view on this is best summed up by the title of this post.) It&#8217;s possible to decry the war and mourn the dead at the same time, but I guess that requires a level of complexity that Rall is incapable of.</p>
<p>This kind of strip is standard fare for Ted Rall though. While I have a lot in common with Rall politically, his motivation often seems to be to piss people off and get attention. I got over trying to use shock value as a persuasive tactic when I was fifteen, but apparently Rall (and his conservative doppelganger, Ann Coulter) never really grew up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-2603</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 21:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=952#comment-2603</guid>
		<description>this is no defense of rall or his &quot;idiot&quot; comment, but i heard that at the same eulogy that tillmans brother went off, tillman was praised as a spiritual man who read the bible and the koran and the book of mormon.

now, ANYWONE who willingly reads the book of mormon just aint all that bright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is no defense of rall or his &#8220;idiot&#8221; comment, but i heard that at the same eulogy that tillmans brother went off, tillman was praised as a spiritual man who read the bible and the koran and the book of mormon.</p>
<p>now, ANYWONE who willingly reads the book of mormon just aint all that bright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-2602</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 19:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=952#comment-2602</guid>
		<description>True, but his family is doing a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/2004-05-03-tillman-service_x.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; ball-busting job&lt;/a&gt; of fighting the media&#039;s forced mythology.  This quote, from Tillman&#039;s brother, is my favorite:

&quot;And Pat was not religious, so he&#039;s not with God, he&#039;s just (expletive) dead.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but his family is doing a <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/2004-05-03-tillman-service_x.htm" rel="nofollow"> ball-busting job</a> of fighting the media&#8217;s forced mythology.  This quote, from Tillman&#8217;s brother, is my favorite:</p>
<p>&#8220;And Pat was not religious, so he&#8217;s not with God, he&#8217;s just (expletive) dead.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the eligible Ross Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/05/05/hate-the-war-love-the-warrior/comment-page-1/#comment-2601</link>
		<dc:creator>the eligible Ross Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 18:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=952#comment-2601</guid>
		<description>I think his phraseology was ridiculous, though to be honest, while I understand the outrage, I&#039;m not really that upset about this. I wish he hadn&#039;t phrased it so it looked like an attack on Tillman. (Though I wonder if he could even help that - his hatred of sports is to the point where I doubt he&#039;s even capable of seeing an athlete as a decent guy). 

Anyway, with respect to the Soldiers who have died, and to the wasted sacrifices they&#039;ve made, let&#039;s honor them as tragic heroes. And I&#039;m with you on the question of Afganistan - they wewre harboring our enemies and we had the right. 

But let&#039;s not distract from the point that Tillman, like ALL dead soldiers, are being used to justify this hyorrible evil war, by these evil, lying, hypocritical, warmongering bastards who hate us and this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think his phraseology was ridiculous, though to be honest, while I understand the outrage, I&#8217;m not really that upset about this. I wish he hadn&#8217;t phrased it so it looked like an attack on Tillman. (Though I wonder if he could even help that &#8211; his hatred of sports is to the point where I doubt he&#8217;s even capable of seeing an athlete as a decent guy). </p>
<p>Anyway, with respect to the Soldiers who have died, and to the wasted sacrifices they&#8217;ve made, let&#8217;s honor them as tragic heroes. And I&#8217;m with you on the question of Afganistan &#8211; they wewre harboring our enemies and we had the right. </p>
<p>But let&#8217;s not distract from the point that Tillman, like ALL dead soldiers, are being used to justify this hyorrible evil war, by these evil, lying, hypocritical, warmongering bastards who hate us and this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

