Notes From The Fifth Column
First of all, let me get one thing out of the way : I want to kill Osama bin Laden.
Every time I see him on TV or think back to the image of people jumping to their deaths out of the smoke-clogged World Trade Center towers, I wish bin Laden and his terrorist buddies were sitting in front of me so I could tear their throats out and make them feel as much pain as the thousands of innocent people whose blood is on their hands. As far as I’m concerned, hell isn’t hot enough to punish them as much as they deserve.
I don’t usually write these kinds of sadistic fantasies, because I find them unsavory and pointless. I’m of the mind that blogs should serve to exorcise demons, not indulge them. Nevertheless, the three years that have passed since the attacks haven’t made my anger toward those who attacked us go away.
Now, forgive me for buying into all the post-9/11 unity, but don’t we already agree on this stuff? Do we really need to repeat our disapproval of terrorist tactics every time there’s a new terrorist attack? From the way the conservative elite tries to paint it, the answers to these questions are “no” and “yes”.
On 9/11, we all mourned. It wasn’t just Republicans who cried when the towers fell or just Democrats who celebrated the heroism of the passengers who fought back in that plane over Pennsylvania. For at least a couple days, we were all on the same team. But the last three years have seen that goodwill demolished.
In his post today commemorating 9/11, Glenn Reynolds echoes Andrew Sullivan’s sentiments about “paralyzing, pseudo-clever, morally nihilist fifth column”. Well, on behalf of everyone in the fifth column, Andrew, Glenn, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, and all their ideological allies can go fuck themselves.
For the last three years we’ve been accused of “blaming America first”, had our patriotism questioned, and been shouted down for asking the most basic of questions about what happened and why. It’s not un-American to speculate about the motives of those who want to kill us or question the tactics that are being used against them. All rational people agree that we didn’t deserve to be hit and that the people responsible should be punished, but until the loony right is willing concede even this minor point, we’ll never have a rational dialogue about the war on terrorism.
So please, please, please spare us all the self-righteous blather like “Unlike some, I haven’t forgotten what happened on that day”. I guarantee you everyone will remember where they were and how they felt on the morning of September 11th. Your enthusiasm for sharing the intimate details of your grief (or my reluctance to share my own) doesn’t make your emotions about what happened or opinions about what should happen next more sincere than anyone else’s.
Likewise, acting as if every attack on the President is an example of the left blaming Bush for 9/11 pretty much ensures that the right will never be in a situation in which they have to defend their ideas. Both the left and the right have very strong views about what should be done, but only one side that devoted their convention to attacking the patriotism of the other. I’m not saying that the Republicans are necessarily wrong about everything, but when we can’t even have an honest debate about the issues, how do they know we’re not right?
8 comments
Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


You may care, but someone doesn’t!
“So I don’t know where (Osama bin Laden) is. You know, I just don’t spend that much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you … I truly am not that concerned about him.”
George W. Bush
March 2003 interview with Kelly Wallace of CNN
Comment by Jerry — September 12, 2004 @ 1:55 am
Thanks, Greg.
Comment by John — September 12, 2004 @ 5:45 am
Are you still harbouring the illusion that the right whingers want to have a two way dialogue? They don’t. They only want a one way narrative and anyone who stands in the path of that narrative is their enemy.
Comment by Robert McClelland — September 12, 2004 @ 9:17 am
Remember how everyone went running out to buy a flag. This unpatriotic flaming liberal who hates America didn’t have to because we already owned a flag. I recognize that I am a deficient American because I only display it occasionally, during the day and when it is not raining. I don’t have flag underwear, t-shirts, bandanas or flip flops — further proof of my disloyalty to the stars and stripes, the official logo of George Bush.
Comment by Becky — September 12, 2004 @ 3:25 pm
great post.
Comment by Alex Fradera — September 13, 2004 @ 6:06 am
Not only did I already own a flag, I observe the proper guidelines for display (only show it at night if illuminated, etc.). But now that I have a Kerry/Edwards sticker on my car, I must be a terr’ist?!? Damn, when did that happen?!? You’d think someone’s friends would do him a favor and take him aside, and say something…
Comment by jeff — September 13, 2004 @ 8:33 am
This woman I used to work with at my last job was a fairly rabid conservative. She loved herself some George Bush all right. She thought Bill O’Reilly was clever. She was a huge supporter of the war in Iraq and thought anyone who wasn’t hated America.
In 2003, when we had the great American blackout, as we were trudging across a street filled with traffic, trying to get to a parking lot to get our respective cars, she said to me,
“You know, in a way, this is so much worse than September 11th.”
I just looked at her for a minute. I couldn’t think of what to respond to such a blatantly selfish statement like that. Finally, after much internal hemming and hawing about calling her out on the carpet for it, I said, “Yeah, except for those 3,000 dead people.”
We haven’t spoken since that day.
Comment by The Critic — September 13, 2004 @ 5:13 pm
Fantastic post; thanks for it. The only thing that disturbs me is that everything I read online like this seems to me to be preaching to the choir. The folks that really need to read and understand posts like this never will. It’s too dangerous to their way of thinking.
Comment by Paul — September 14, 2004 @ 10:49 am