Comments on: Zapruder Jr.

By: EH

EH — Thu, 07 Oct 2004 01:32:06 +0000

And your testimony about the material on Bush’s podium is using the same rank speculation that you accuse the “wingers” of.

Bill, I have to say this made me laugh out loud. Were you actually too dense to get the point, or were you trying to do some sort of “meta-irony” thing?

By: Peter

Peter — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 20:19:23 +0000

Bush only says that Jesus is his favorite philosopher. Now if GW would only read his teachings.

By: things fall apart

things fall apart — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 16:18:23 +0000

Devil Kerry Cheats In Debates

things fall apart was also able to transcribe the words spoken by Kerry; again, this incident happened so quickly that it was heard by viewers of the debate on only a subconscious level.
“Followers of Bush and people of Earth, know this — upon my i…

By: Becky

Becky — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:41:50 +0000

Obviously, Bush had his Bible on the podium. I can’t help but wonder, if God chose Bush to be president,why did he make him look like an jackass? Maybe God has changed his mind (flip flopped) since Bush squandered his opportunity to make this world a better place to live. Perhaps Bush is just not praying enough. Afterall, praying is hard work.

By: eRobin

eRobin — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:24:34 +0000

Let’s assume for a moment that John Kerry did cheat and pulled out a ream of notes from his jacket. If that’s the case and John Kerry had been breaking the rules, how is it his fault that Bush is bitchy and retarded?

LOL

By: Gregzilla

Gregzilla — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 12:46:27 +0000

Ruth is right! Ruth is right! Everyone read what Ruth wrote.

By: Shannon Hubbell

Shannon Hubbell — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:53:39 +0000

I interpreted it as sarcasm, but this is my first time reading this blog so I may not be one to judge.

Check this out… a neocon blog I read posted this:
http://antiprotester.blogspot.com/2004/10/did-kerry-cheat_03.html

Mentions the Kerry cheat sheet bullshit, then goes on to complain about the liberally biased LIGHTING ON THE SET.

By: Ruth

Ruth — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:29:10 +0000

Correct me if I’m wrong here, but weren’t Greg’s accusations about Bush supposed to be “using the same rank speculation that [he] accused the “wingers” of”? Wasn’t the POINT to show that it was just as illogical and inconclusive as the accusations against Kerry?

It sure looks like he’s being sarcastic to me, and I actually thought it was a very well-written appeal to logic and common sense. But maybe I completely missed the point.

By: Fr33d0m

Fr33d0m — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 06:53:27 +0000

The winger above has it about right. If those pictures of Bush are the best we can do we may as well get off the point already.

They have a pic of him reaching in his jacket and the best we can do is a series of pics of nothing?
That is a pretty sad display which has me wondering if I should delete you from my list. I expect you at least think about what your posting.

Lets have no more of these silly Drudge style postings unless you will clue us in that its a joke.

By: Umanity

Umanity — Tue, 05 Oct 2004 01:56:11 +0000

What is completely amazing about this is that the rightwingers still can’t explain how Kerry’s having a pen made GW look like mush on the podium. How can a pen be mightier than Bushs Bullshit?

I don’t believe for a single millisecond that Kerry cheated. I am more inclined to believe that Bush was the one who needed cheat sheets {and if he did and still messed up this bad, then please get Bush out of office and in for a check up}. Kerry was on top of his game, and Bush displayed his skills like a trooper {a very bad and mentally challenged trooper}.

Lets watch Edwards mop the floor with the lame excuse for a VP Cheney!!!!

Michael Uman