<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush&#8217;s Gay Flip-Flop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/10/26/bushs-gay-flip-flop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/10/26/bushs-gay-flip-flop/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RKC</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/10/26/bushs-gay-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-4812</link>
		<dc:creator>RKC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1386#comment-4812</guid>
		<description>Interesting that he uses the word &quot;Rights.&quot;  If Civil Unions protect rights, then under the equal protection clause of the Constitution, the courts have a duty to enforce those rights, at the Federal level.

But I&#039;m sure Bush wasn&#039;t thinking about the actual meaning of what he was saying.

A few months ago Bush was on Larry King when he made a comment which I thought was hilarious, but which passed without much comment at the time.  Defending his position on gay marriage, Bush said something to this effect: &quot;If there are concerns by some gay people about such things as having the right to inherit, I say the answer to that is to eliminate the Estate Tax.&quot;

This appears to make no sense, since if you don&#039;t have the right to inherit, it doesen&#039;t help to have no estate tax, but perhaps Bush is planting the seeds for a compromise: Gay people can get married if they agree to pay the estate taxes of heterosexuals.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that he uses the word &#8220;Rights.&#8221;  If Civil Unions protect rights, then under the equal protection clause of the Constitution, the courts have a duty to enforce those rights, at the Federal level.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m sure Bush wasn&#8217;t thinking about the actual meaning of what he was saying.</p>
<p>A few months ago Bush was on Larry King when he made a comment which I thought was hilarious, but which passed without much comment at the time.  Defending his position on gay marriage, Bush said something to this effect: &#8220;If there are concerns by some gay people about such things as having the right to inherit, I say the answer to that is to eliminate the Estate Tax.&#8221;</p>
<p>This appears to make no sense, since if you don&#8217;t have the right to inherit, it doesen&#8217;t help to have no estate tax, but perhaps Bush is planting the seeds for a compromise: Gay people can get married if they agree to pay the estate taxes of heterosexuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/10/26/bushs-gay-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-4811</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1386#comment-4811</guid>
		<description>Jesus...

is this desperation or speaking off-script?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus&#8230;</p>
<p>is this desperation or speaking off-script?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eRobin</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2004/10/26/bushs-gay-flip-flop/comment-page-1/#comment-4810</link>
		<dc:creator>eRobin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1386#comment-4810</guid>
		<description>I hate hypotheticals, but just imagine the hew and cry in the NYT if Kerry flipped like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate hypotheticals, but just imagine the hew and cry in the NYT if Kerry flipped like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
