<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Two-Sided Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/04/16/a-two-sided-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/04/16/a-two-sided-question/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/04/16/a-two-sided-question/comment-page-1/#comment-6509</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1713#comment-6509</guid>
		<description>Check out the book &quot;Full Spectrum Disorder,&quot; author&#039;s name escapse me.  He went from fifteen years in the Special Forces to being a left-wing revolutionary.  And it&#039;s well-written.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the book &#8220;Full Spectrum Disorder,&#8221; author&#8217;s name escapse me.  He went from fifteen years in the Special Forces to being a left-wing revolutionary.  And it&#8217;s well-written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike d.</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/04/16/a-two-sided-question/comment-page-1/#comment-6508</link>
		<dc:creator>mike d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1713#comment-6508</guid>
		<description>This is a good article from tompaine.com written late last year addressing some of the misperceptions that a few liberals have about the military:&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tompaine.com/articles/military_misconceptions.php?dateid=20050419&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Military Misconceptions&lt;/a&gt;
Also, I can&#039;t find the link right now, but a survey I read in Dec.2004 said that while most navy and Army officers are Republicans, the ranks are roughly split one third Dems, one third repubs, and the rest independent or apolitical. Not too surprising to me anyway, is that the Marines have a larger proportion of liberals then any branch of the military. I recently came across this marine&#039;s blog, &lt;a href=&quot;http://civilcoldwar.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; A Liberal Marines Progressive Perspective&lt;/a&gt;.   
Also, it seems to me being from a three genertion military family, that most military are cultural liberals, but unfortunately buy the conservative BS on foreign policy. The military itself is a good example of liberialism, with fairness in promotions without regard to race or gender. And while their are internal office like political games to play to move way up the ranks, promotions are based on merit, not the good ol boy system.
Lastly; the single biggest thing progressives can do to moderate the political landscape in the military officer corps is to encourage public universities to allow ROTC programs. Average folks with moderate political opinions would then be a larger part of the officer class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good article from tompaine.com written late last year addressing some of the misperceptions that a few liberals have about the military:<a href="http://www.tompaine.com/articles/military_misconceptions.php?dateid=20050419" rel="nofollow">Military Misconceptions</a><br />
Also, I can&#8217;t find the link right now, but a survey I read in Dec.2004 said that while most navy and Army officers are Republicans, the ranks are roughly split one third Dems, one third repubs, and the rest independent or apolitical. Not too surprising to me anyway, is that the Marines have a larger proportion of liberals then any branch of the military. I recently came across this marine&#8217;s blog, <a href="http://civilcoldwar.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"> A Liberal Marines Progressive Perspective</a>.<br />
Also, it seems to me being from a three genertion military family, that most military are cultural liberals, but unfortunately buy the conservative BS on foreign policy. The military itself is a good example of liberialism, with fairness in promotions without regard to race or gender. And while their are internal office like political games to play to move way up the ranks, promotions are based on merit, not the good ol boy system.<br />
Lastly; the single biggest thing progressives can do to moderate the political landscape in the military officer corps is to encourage public universities to allow ROTC programs. Average folks with moderate political opinions would then be a larger part of the officer class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim marquis</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/04/16/a-two-sided-question/comment-page-1/#comment-6507</link>
		<dc:creator>jim marquis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1713#comment-6507</guid>
		<description>Great point. I appreciate what the military does for us but I don&#039;t count on them for info related to global strategy or politics or philsophy or a whole lot of other extremely important stuff.

I also liked what Natalie Maines said about the soldiers backing Bush because they&#039;re scared and they need something or someone to focus on. For the most part they&#039;re young and impressionable and stuck in a situation that definitely does not encourge independent thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point. I appreciate what the military does for us but I don&#8217;t count on them for info related to global strategy or politics or philsophy or a whole lot of other extremely important stuff.</p>
<p>I also liked what Natalie Maines said about the soldiers backing Bush because they&#8217;re scared and they need something or someone to focus on. For the most part they&#8217;re young and impressionable and stuck in a situation that definitely does not encourge independent thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr33d0m</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/04/16/a-two-sided-question/comment-page-1/#comment-6506</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr33d0m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 03:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1713#comment-6506</guid>
		<description>It is not the Repugnicons who appeal to the military folk, it is the military that appeals to conservatives... mostly the ones NOT in power.

And instead of &lt;em&gt;&quot;with the men and women who are the most informed about our country&#039;s problems&quot;&lt;/em&gt; how about &quot;with the most educated men and women in America?&quot;

Neither is a silver bullet, but the first allows easy arguments about what it is to be informed, or about rightly vs. wrongly informed.  The second has the same weakness but the arguement is harder for them to make despite their &quot;liberal elite&quot; meme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not the Repugnicons who appeal to the military folk, it is the military that appeals to conservatives&#8230; mostly the ones NOT in power.</p>
<p>And instead of <em>&#8220;with the men and women who are the most informed about our country&#8217;s problems&#8221;</em> how about &#8220;with the most educated men and women in America?&#8221;</p>
<p>Neither is a silver bullet, but the first allows easy arguments about what it is to be informed, or about rightly vs. wrongly informed.  The second has the same weakness but the arguement is harder for them to make despite their &#8220;liberal elite&#8221; meme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
