<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;More To Come&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/04/26/more-to-come/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/04/26/more-to-come/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:04:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/04/26/more-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-6631</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1740#comment-6631</guid>
		<description>Awww,  you guys are no fun!
What about a conspiracy of ignorance? Deliberately ignoring warnings so that whatever was in the works was sure to happen. That way, the neocons get their &quot;second Pearl Harbor&quot; and nobody actually plotted or aided Al-Qaeda.
However, this piece that I found at The Poor Man is mightly suspicious:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/printer_5286.shtml

FBI PROTECTS OSAMA BIN LADEN?S ?RIGHT TO PRIVACY? IN DOCUMENT RELEASE

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that fights government corruption, announced today that it has obtained documents through the Freedom of Information Act (?FOIA?) in which the Federal Bureau of Investigation (?FBI?) has invoked privacy right protections on behalf of al Qaeda terror leader Osama bin Laden.  In a September 24, 2003 declassified ?Secret? FBI report obtained by Judicial Watch, the FBI invoked Exemption 6 under FOIA law on behalf of bin Laden, which permits the government to withhold all information about U.S. persons in ?personnel and medical files and similar files? when the disclosure of such information ?would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.? (5 U.S.C. ? 552(b)(6) (2000))

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awww,  you guys are no fun!<br />
What about a conspiracy of ignorance? Deliberately ignoring warnings so that whatever was in the works was sure to happen. That way, the neocons get their &#8220;second Pearl Harbor&#8221; and nobody actually plotted or aided Al-Qaeda.<br />
However, this piece that I found at The Poor Man is mightly suspicious:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.judicialwatch.org/printer_5286.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.judicialwatch.org/printer_5286.shtml</a></p>
<p>FBI PROTECTS OSAMA BIN LADEN?S ?RIGHT TO PRIVACY? IN DOCUMENT RELEASE</p>
<p>Judicial Watch, the public interest group that fights government corruption, announced today that it has obtained documents through the Freedom of Information Act (?FOIA?) in which the Federal Bureau of Investigation (?FBI?) has invoked privacy right protections on behalf of al Qaeda terror leader Osama bin Laden.  In a September 24, 2003 declassified ?Secret? FBI report obtained by Judicial Watch, the FBI invoked Exemption 6 under FOIA law on behalf of bin Laden, which permits the government to withhold all information about U.S. persons in ?personnel and medical files and similar files? when the disclosure of such information ?would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.? (5 U.S.C. ? 552(b)(6) (2000))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roddy McCorley</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/04/26/more-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-6630</link>
		<dc:creator>Roddy McCorley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1740#comment-6630</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a conspiracy to sell.  But I will say that if Bush had actively conspired with bin Laden, the results would not have been significantly different from what we have now.

Luckily, sheer incompetence explains things every bit as neatly as any number of conspiracy theories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a conspiracy to sell.  But I will say that if Bush had actively conspired with bin Laden, the results would not have been significantly different from what we have now.</p>
<p>Luckily, sheer incompetence explains things every bit as neatly as any number of conspiracy theories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-mart</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/04/26/more-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-6629</link>
		<dc:creator>E-mart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1740#comment-6629</guid>
		<description>Actually, according to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/22jul20041130/www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/sec1.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;9/11 Commission Report&lt;/a&gt; (Pages 35 and 38), Bush was notified of the first plane earlier outside the classroom, and Card&#039;s whispered comment referenced in the above article is the statement after the second crash that &quot;America is under attack.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, according to the <a href="http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/22jul20041130/www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/sec1.pdf" rel="nofollow">9/11 Commission Report</a> (Pages 35 and 38), Bush was notified of the first plane earlier outside the classroom, and Card&#8217;s whispered comment referenced in the above article is the statement after the second crash that &#8220;America is under attack.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

