Comments on: Bitchenstein http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/05/12/bitchenstein/ Just another WordPress weblog Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:58:51 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Milly http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/05/12/bitchenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-6692 Milly Wed, 18 May 2005 18:09:36 +0000 http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1768#comment-6692 i think your a nasty person for saying all of that! roy lichtenstein is a creative genius! even though his pictures are only from cartoons, they are interesting and alot of people love them including me. so shut up.. i think is just because your jelous! and infact i got an a* in my gcse just beacuse of roy lichtenstein! so hes not the paintings he hangs in an art gallery rnt crap because if they were they would be there in the first place would then!? i think your a nasty person for saying all of that! roy lichtenstein is a creative genius! even though his pictures are only from cartoons, they are interesting and alot of people love them including me. so shut up.. i think is just because your jelous! and infact i got an a* in my gcse just beacuse of roy lichtenstein! so hes not the paintings he hangs in an art gallery rnt crap because if they were they would be there in the first place would then!?

]]> By: artEast http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/05/12/bitchenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-6691 artEast Wed, 18 May 2005 16:53:25 +0000 http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1768#comment-6691 tomN!, you're not worth much more of my time than this. I call myself arteast because it makes the sound you would expect to hear when some self-important (you perhaps) fag with a beret walks in the room and says, "I am an art-teast!" The accent goes on the second syllable. It was a joke, one you missed, from the beginning. And yes I did go to art school. I also chose east because I am in Asia. So take your stupid American-NYC mentality, and your self-absorbed grandstanding, and learn how to write a truly vile and scathing remark about someone else whom you don't know. arteast. tomN!, you’re not worth much more of my time than this. I call myself arteast because it makes the sound you would expect to hear when some self-important (you perhaps) fag with a beret walks in the room and says, “I am an art-teast!” The accent goes on the second syllable. It was a joke, one you missed, from the beginning. And yes I did go to art school. I also chose east because I am in Asia. So take your stupid American-NYC mentality, and your self-absorbed grandstanding, and learn how to write a truly vile and scathing remark about someone else whom you don’t know. arteast.

]]> By: Kip W http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/05/12/bitchenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-6690 Kip W Tue, 17 May 2005 19:57:32 +0000 http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1768#comment-6690 Put me in the camp of those who find his work boring and repetitive. He found a shtick, latching on to the work of those more talented then he was, and it makes him money so he sticks with it. He's a brand. He branched out a little, copying other more talented artists -- great masters -- and putting in his cheesy, poorly observed version of benday dots. It's dull to look at, and irritating when you see how much better his source material was and how little the real artists got for it. His lettering sucks too. <p>I was with some folks at MoMA to see some widescreen cartoons a while back, and there was one of his pieces. I suggested we go somewhere else, because I had a strange desire to add my own artistic genius to his vision. You know, make a witty, ironic comment on it! Like "artists" do!! <p>Don't give him credit for any acceptance comic art has now. Artists have always explored the lowbrow world -- just look at trompe l'oeil stuff from the 1800s, or chuckle at John Held Jr's woodcut cartoons in <i>The New Yorker</i>, or even just look at better Pop artists. <p>Well, at least he's less boring than Rothko. Maybe that's why some people think he was clever. Context! </p></p></p> Put me in the camp of those who find his work boring and repetitive. He found a shtick, latching on to the work of those more talented then he was, and it makes him money so he sticks with it. He’s a brand. He branched out a little, copying other more talented artists — great masters — and putting in his cheesy, poorly observed version of benday dots. It’s dull to look at, and irritating when you see how much better his source material was and how little the real artists got for it. His lettering sucks too.

I was with some folks at MoMA to see some widescreen cartoons a while back, and there was one of his pieces. I suggested we go somewhere else, because I had a strange desire to add my own artistic genius to his vision. You know, make a witty, ironic comment on it! Like “artists” do!!

Don’t give him credit for any acceptance comic art has now. Artists have always explored the lowbrow world — just look at trompe l’oeil stuff from the 1800s, or chuckle at John Held Jr’s woodcut cartoons in The New Yorker, or even just look at better Pop artists.

Well, at least he’s less boring than Rothko. Maybe that’s why some people think he was clever. Context!

]]> By: Dr. Pants http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/05/12/bitchenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-6689 Dr. Pants Mon, 16 May 2005 17:55:30 +0000 http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1768#comment-6689 And now you like comic books, too. If I wasn't married and you were a woman and I liked men who are women, I would totally fall in love with you, given the right dowry. And now you like comic books, too. If I wasn’t married and you were a woman and I liked men who are women, I would totally fall in love with you, given the right dowry.

]]>