Comments on: Defending Karl http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/07/14/defending-karl/ Just another WordPress weblog Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:58:51 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Mr. Snitch! http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/07/14/defending-karl/comment-page-1/#comment-7296 Mr. Snitch! Mon, 18 Jul 2005 01:48:44 +0000 http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1883#comment-7296 Quite right 'd'. Getting this excited over an unresolved case suggests that innocent until proven guilty goes out the window when you want someone proven guilty badly enough. Will blogs such as this one say 'we were wrong' if this case doesn't pan out? Or will they just bury the whole thing and find someone else to accuse? Quite right ‘d’. Getting this excited over an unresolved case suggests that innocent until proven guilty goes out the window when you want someone proven guilty badly enough. Will blogs such as this one say ‘we were wrong’ if this case doesn’t pan out? Or will they just bury the whole thing and find someone else to accuse?

]]> By: d http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/07/14/defending-karl/comment-page-1/#comment-7295 d Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:33:06 +0000 http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=1883#comment-7295 careful on the documents - the forgeries are about 6 months <i>after </i>the trip and therefore not relevant to Wilson. Also Congo was the country that was speculated by the British press. The "liberal" blogs are way, way too far in front of themselves on this one. careful on the documents – the forgeries are about 6 months after the trip and therefore not relevant to Wilson.

Also Congo was the country that was speculated by the British press.

The “liberal” blogs are way, way too far in front of themselves on this one.

]]>