God Loves Jocks More Than You
Wow. Atrios wasn’t kidding. This really is one of the stupidest things ever written :
Athletes do things that seem transcendental — and they can also do things that are transcendentally stupid. They choke, trip and dope. Nevertheless, they possess a deep physical knowledge the rest of us can learn from, bound as we are by our ordinary, trudging, cumbersome selves. Ever get the feeling that they are in touch with something that we aren’t? What is that thing? Could it be their random, mutant talent, or could it be evidence of, gulp, intelligent design?
. . .
The idea, so contentious in other contexts, actually rings a loud bell in sports. Athletes often talk of feeling an absolute fulfillment of purpose, of something powerful moving through them or in them that is not just the result of training. Jeffrey M. Schwartz, a neuroscientist and research professor of psychiatry at the UCLA School of Medicine, is a believer in ID, or as he prefers to call it, “intrinsic intelligence.” Schwartz wants to launch a study of NASCAR drivers, to better understand their extraordinary focus. He finds Darwinism, as it applies to a high-performance athlete such as Tony Stewart, to be problematic. To claim that Stewart’s mental state as he handles a high-speed car “is a result of nothing more than random processes coming together in a machine-like way is not a coherent explanation,” Schwartz said.Instead, Schwartz theorizes that when a great athlete focuses, he or she may be “making a connection with something deep within nature itself, which lends itself to deepening our intelligence.” It’s fascinating thought. And Schwartz would like to prove it’s scientifically justifiable.
. . .
Schwarz finds little or nothing in natural selection to explain the ability of athletes to reinterpret physical events from moment to moment, the super-awareness that they seem to possess. He has a term for it, the ability to be an “impartial spectator” to your own actions. “The capacity to stand outside yourself and be aware of where you are,” he said. “Deep within the complexities of molecular organization lies an intrinsic intelligence that accounts for that deep organization, and is something that we can connect with through the willful focus of our minds,” he theorizes.
Now, there are some who might read this and come to the conclusion that article was the work of a writer so seduced by the romantic ideals that sports fans have of their idols that he/she can’t see that these seemingly perfect athletes sometimes turn out to be cannibalistic rapists or wife-beating murderers, but there’s a simpler explanation. Jesus…I mean, the creator designed athletes to represent the pinnacle of human ability. How else can you explain The Power Team?

The power of Christ compels you…to destroy this pile of bricks with your head.
7 comments
Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


who’s that photoshopped dude with glasses to the left of the guy bottom center?
Comment by tomN! — August 29, 2005 @ 12:41 pm
I dunno. I found this through a Google image serach, so some guy may have put himself in the photo or something.
BTW, the bio section of The Power Team site is hilarious. My favorite is this one for Jannet Abraham-Clark :
It’s nice to see that the “minister of pain” is so inspirational.
Comment by greg — August 29, 2005 @ 12:53 pm
ross needs to steal “the abra-hammer” from her.
Comment by tomN! — August 29, 2005 @ 2:09 pm
For more on creation versus evolution, see MommyCool.com for a great short story of a man-making contest pitting God against scientists…the outcome makes sense.
Comment by PapaCool — August 29, 2005 @ 2:20 pm
Let me get this straight: because random chance didn’t create certain humans’ ability to drive quickly around in circles, that’s supposed to mean that God actual gives a fuck about NASCAR? Is that why so many races are on Sunday?
Comment by Donnie — August 30, 2005 @ 8:43 am
I recently discovered the power of Jazzercise on the universe. It has to do with the vibrations from the Jazz movements (flick-kick and heel-hop, especially) on the very processes of creation and evolution, as I understand it. So maybe this athletes and “intrinsic (molecular) intelligence” is true. After all, I’m no world class athlete, so I certainly don’t have that kind of intelligence to question them.
Or to put it more succinctly, What Would Tiger Do?
Comment by Bob Davis — August 30, 2005 @ 8:44 am
What I love about shit like this is that it’s *invariably* written by — well, writers, who are known for almost NEVER being world-class athletes. As such, there’s pretty much no way you can call it anything but pure conjecture, fueled by the (probably) leading questions they ask the athletes they interview for their stories. Assuming they even bother to do that.
In other words, as long as you don’t interview even one dissenting source, congratulations! Your story’s airtight!
Comment by Briantologist — August 30, 2005 @ 11:19 am