Billmon and others have pointed to this article in the Times and congratulating the Dems for growing a pair (a sentiment I 100% agree with), but forgive me for raining on the parade. [emphasis added]

Congressional Republicans signaled today that they have abandoned their plan to conduct a joint House-Senate probe of the government’s response to Hurricane Katrina.

In announcing a joint probe this month, the Republican leadership had said it would be the most efficient way to investigate the administration’s much-criticized initial response to the hurricane. But today, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) conceded that he could not overcome Democratic opposition to a joint investigation.

The Democratic leadership has refused to appoint members to a joint committee, citing the lack of equal representation of Democrats on the panel, and the lack of power to issue subpoenas that the majority opposed. Democrats also have insisted on an independent inquiry.

Democratic opposition has left Republicans little maneuvering room for mounting a credible probe. With the joint investigation apparently off the table, Republicans can only hope that Democrats will participate in each chamber’s separate investigation. It was far from clear today that Democrats would do that.

Did the writer at the Times not even read the sentence she typed immediately preceeding the one I highlighted or does a non-partisan, independent inquiry not “credible” enough? I’m glad the Democrats played hardball here, but the conventional wisdom is in danger of forming around that old “Democrats are obstructionists” canard.