<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Separation of Powers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/10/10/separation-of-powers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/10/10/separation-of-powers/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:58:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/10/10/separation-of-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-8096</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 01:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=2067#comment-8096</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve certainly discovered a barrel of worms here.  There&#039;s probably a specific law ordering (what laws do) the Justice Department to delay or deprioritize enforcement of some laws during catastophes.  I say probably, but by no means assuradly.  Respect for legal process is in a bit of trouble with this administration...
Any way, the barrel of worms is the issue of government agencies taking on the responsibilties of the legislative branch.  For instance, when the EPA uses science and public comment to create regulations, they are, according to some legal philosophers, meddling in the legislative branch&#039;s activities.  The legislature should be creating the specific laws under which we live, not some government employee.  Perhaps this might seem mere quibbling, but I don&#039;t think we want some Homeland Security guy choosing the boundaries of free association.  Any way, good post.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve certainly discovered a barrel of worms here.  There&#8217;s probably a specific law ordering (what laws do) the Justice Department to delay or deprioritize enforcement of some laws during catastophes.  I say probably, but by no means assuradly.  Respect for legal process is in a bit of trouble with this administration&#8230;<br />
Any way, the barrel of worms is the issue of government agencies taking on the responsibilties of the legislative branch.  For instance, when the EPA uses science and public comment to create regulations, they are, according to some legal philosophers, meddling in the legislative branch&#8217;s activities.  The legislature should be creating the specific laws under which we live, not some government employee.  Perhaps this might seem mere quibbling, but I don&#8217;t think we want some Homeland Security guy choosing the boundaries of free association.  Any way, good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/10/10/separation-of-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-8095</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=2067#comment-8095</guid>
		<description>hey! Selective enforcement is a long and proud tradition in law enforcement! Why, hookers have long enjoyed the benefits of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey! Selective enforcement is a long and proud tradition in law enforcement! Why, hookers have long enjoyed the benefits of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slim</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/10/10/separation-of-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-8094</link>
		<dc:creator>slim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=2067#comment-8094</guid>
		<description>The worst thing about the Justice Dept.&#039;s &quot;waiver&quot; for hurricane victims is that, to my understanding, they didn&#039;t waive any of the substantive portions of the act.  They only waived the requirement that debtors go through &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wwltv.com/topstories/stories/wwl100405bankruptcy.c0adcb3a.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;6 months of credit counseling&lt;/a&gt; before they file.  

The sole reason for the waiver was to get headlines for the Bush administration that said &quot;Justice Dept. eases new bankruptcy rules for hurricane victims&quot; without actually doing anything to help these people (and, more pointedly, without jeopardizing even $1 the credit card companies are due).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst thing about the Justice Dept.&#8217;s &#8220;waiver&#8221; for hurricane victims is that, to my understanding, they didn&#8217;t waive any of the substantive portions of the act.  They only waived the requirement that debtors go through <a href="http://www.wwltv.com/topstories/stories/wwl100405bankruptcy.c0adcb3a.html" rel="nofollow">6 months of credit counseling</a> before they file.  </p>
<p>The sole reason for the waiver was to get headlines for the Bush administration that said &#8220;Justice Dept. eases new bankruptcy rules for hurricane victims&#8221; without actually doing anything to help these people (and, more pointedly, without jeopardizing even $1 the credit card companies are due).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Furious</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/10/10/separation-of-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-8093</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Furious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 04:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=2067#comment-8093</guid>
		<description>Nope. Not a dick. You&#039;re right, this is total bullshit. Repeal it if necessary, but you can&#039;t &quot;wish it away&quot; for some people...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope. Not a dick. You&#8217;re right, this is total bullshit. Repeal it if necessary, but you can&#8217;t &#8220;wish it away&#8221; for some people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
