The Evolving Watchmaker
We all know that intelligent design is bad science, it it turns out that it’s bad design too (via Kottke):
In 1802, the English philosopher William Paley, in a kind of predecessor to ID, famously used the case of coming across a rock and a watch in a field. Unlike the rock, the watch consists of the complex interplay of a number of moving parts, each of which is required to make it function. “The inference is inevitable,” said Paley. “The watch must have a maker.”
. . .
Let’s say that instead of a watch in that field, we take the example of an observer coming across an iPod at a trade show. It is a sleek, well-crafted device that has a clever interface and seems to hold thousands of songs. The observer is curious: How could this small object perform these miraculous tasks? He would like to pry it open and figure it out, but there is just something so compelling about the smooth white exterior. It just seems too perfect to disturb, to interrogate. Its microchip architecture is just too complex.
. . .
In the real world, design is Darwinian. To consider the iPod, it did not spring fully formed from the mind of a powerful Designer, but rather it represents one distinct point on a long evolutionary timeline. We would have to go back at least as far as the introduction of recorded music, then trace the increasing portability of that music, through car radios and miniaturized transistor radios after World War II. We would then have to move from the transistor radio with single earpiece to the stereo cassette Walkman, which gave the user the opportunity to listen to what they wanted, when they wanted, in a hermetically sealed mobile environment.The Walkman, and later the Discman (for tapes were made extinct), laid the social groundwork for the iPod: the idea — and it was a radical one — that it was acceptable to walk around encased in one own’s music. And before the iPod, of course, there were any number of MP3 players (the latest evolutionary medium), each of which were severely limited by their capacity or clunky controls. In their fossilized remains we can see how the iPod came into being, the ideal melding of what was then the most advanced hard drive and an elegant, almost “natural” interface — topped off by styling that was rather divine.
B-b-b-but if I can’t understand it, then it must be the work of god.
4 comments
Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


In their fossilized remains we can see how the iPod came into being, the ideal melding of what was then the most advanced hard drive and an elegant, almost “natural” interface — topped off by styling that was rather divine.
ipod porn + Idiotic Design ? give that man a prize.
Comment by almostinfamous — October 18, 2005 @ 11:26 am
It used to be you could quiet these fanatics by saying, ‘We really don’t know how long one of God’s days are.’ That would usually suffice – at least get them to scratch their heads and consider the possibility. Science then became part of God’s plan, you see and therefore not something to oppose.
Unfortunately, with the advent of TV oracles such as Robertson and Dobson, those people who could have been led into at least some form of independent thought, now have someone else to do it for them. Why bother to read the Bible for yourself, when some puffed up prophet on the tube will wrap everything neatly and serve it up with a smile? So – we are now back to six days literally being six days – no other interpretation allowed.
Comment by The Fat Lady Sings — October 18, 2005 @ 11:36 am
If it must be the work of god, and the IPod is an Apple product and Steve Jobs controls all Apple product designs, then Steve Jobs is God.
But this is not true. It is a logical fallacy. If Steve Jobs were God, then Microsoft, being led by Bill Gates (i.e. The Devil) would be a small company producing wristwatches out of Redmond. And we know that Microsoft is bigger than that (a bit). Therefore, Jobs is not God, and the IPod is not Intelligently Designed, and thus we arrive at our proof of Evolution as the controlling force of progress in the world.
a modest experiment
Comment by Bob Davis — October 18, 2005 @ 12:33 pm
Personally, I love the “science of analogies” that ID always seems to trigger.
Yes, your stylish MP3 player was designed. That does not mean your circulatory system was.
If anything, I’d prefer the Douglas Adams school of deity logic. God is proven to exist, thus eliminating faith by replacing it with proof and God, who exists because of faith, suddenly ceased to exist.
Comment by Dr. Pants — October 18, 2005 @ 3:21 pm