Nip/Tuck
Remember last year when the conservative blogosphere was buzzing about John Kerry having botox? Apparently it’s not just the efette liberals who are having work done (via Andrew Sullivan) :
Mr. DeLay has had a makeover. National Journal reported that in 2003, right after he announced his bid for House Majority leader, DeLay “had his dentist cap his two upper front teeth to fill the small gap between them.
. . .
Then last year Roll Call reported, “Tom DeLay has joined the nip-and-tuck club.”
“I had my eyes checked by my ophthalmologist,” DeLay said last year; the newspaper reported that “his upper lids had become so heavy, as they are prone to do with age, that they were ‘blocking my vision.’ To show how well the surgery worked, he looked up. No more upper lid visor. ‘I can even see my eyebrows!’ he said.”
Looks like he had some rhinoplasty too, not that it’s a big deal. Seriously, I don’t care whether or not Tom DeLay had cosmetic surgery beyond the fact that it highlights, once again, the hypocrisy of Republican politicians whose entire careers are built on the lie that they’re more down-to-Earth than their Democratic opponents. I’m so goddamned tired of the “liberals are elitists” talking point, which seemed to soar to new heights in last years election with the endless carping about botox, windsurfing, and cheesesteaks “whiz with”. I wish for once we could just agree that all politicians are image-obsessed phonies and get back to the question about who would do a better job governing.
4 comments
Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.



As someone in the optical field, I have to point out that blepharoplasty (the eyelid thing) is one of those 50/50 cosmetic/medical procedures–partially for vanity, partially so you can see again.
However, Tom DeLay, vain or merely medically aware, is still a rat-faced dog of a man.
Comment by JB — October 22, 2005 @ 7:38 am
Lots of stuff that’s bad for Democrats is good for Republicans. For instance, it’s bad for a Democrat who is a judge to donate to liberal causes, liberal blogs or the Democratic party because it could indicate an inappropriate conflict of interest when they have to try a Republican, but it is alright for a Republican Congressman to transfer large amounts of corporate money to the national party and have the money transfered back to local Republican candidates who can’t accept corporate money because that is in the Republican’s interest. NO hypocracy here.
Comment by Kamachanda — October 22, 2005 @ 9:21 am
Of course not, you’re expected to ignore finance laws in Congress, where you can be partisan. But if a judge admits to having views, well, that is heresy.
Comment by Andy — October 22, 2005 @ 7:20 pm
Still ugly…
Comment by DUDACKATTACK!!! — October 24, 2005 @ 1:11 pm