<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Still Treason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/10/28/its-still-treason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/10/28/its-still-treason/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:04:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent 99</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/10/28/its-still-treason/comment-page-1/#comment-8373</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent 99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=2106#comment-8373</guid>
		<description>It is my fervent hope that Fitzgerald simply ran out of time with this grand jury; there&#039;s plenty more he intends to bring before another one, but just cannot see his way clear to say right now.  Miller held up the works for a YEAR, and the White House has surely been dancing around, trying to help the clock run out.  What if he just flat out insisted this Grand Jury be able to indict that for which they had foolproof evidence, and fully intends to complete his work for the rest of the indictments with a new grand jury?  Isn&#039;t that as possible as anything else, given his statements?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my fervent hope that Fitzgerald simply ran out of time with this grand jury; there&#8217;s plenty more he intends to bring before another one, but just cannot see his way clear to say right now.  Miller held up the works for a YEAR, and the White House has surely been dancing around, trying to help the clock run out.  What if he just flat out insisted this Grand Jury be able to indict that for which they had foolproof evidence, and fully intends to complete his work for the rest of the indictments with a new grand jury?  Isn&#8217;t that as possible as anything else, given his statements?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syncmaster</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2005/10/28/its-still-treason/comment-page-1/#comment-8372</link>
		<dc:creator>Syncmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/wp/?p=2106#comment-8372</guid>
		<description>I thought she went out with Ames and thats why they murdered the Deputy dircetor FSB before the Rice visit.  Maybe it was Rice&#039;s degree that blew the covert CIA WMD training program at CIA 

or was that Plame?


DOJ lost its law enforcement capabilities domestically(it&#039;s in the CIA charter at Congress that CIA oeprates domestically and has badges like other law enforcement agencies) and internationally.  After DOJ was turned over to Porter Goss, they indict a US government employee.  It makes no sense, they report to the Director at CIA.  It is, at the least, a conflict of interest and, at worst, Plame following through on a foreign intelligence operation(yellowcake was a known red herring, hence Wilson and Spain) through DOJ, which now reports to CIA.  Lawyers can&#039;t figure this out?

The only person indictable is Plame who confirmed she was a CIA Operations Officer, paramilitarily trained in &#039;Vanity Fair.&#039;  The assassinations of the Spanish operations officers in Iraq followed immediately and, later, the Madrid bombing and coup.  These were expected results Plame could not find in attacking US government officials.  &#039;Vanity Fair the movie&#039; is actually about these type of persons and their insanity.  Maybe she did&#039;nt like the movie.?

Did Plame have a waiver or get a waiver from DOJ for do not prosecute?


The statement below can&#039;t be more funny.  This is exactly what Plame did:
 
&#039;The responsibilities of certain CIA employees required that their association with the CIA be kept secret. As a result, the fact that these individuals were employed by the CIA was classified. Disclosure of the fact that such individuals were employed by the CIA had the potential to damage the national security in ways that ranged from preventing the future use of those individuals in a covert capacity, to compromising intelligence gathering methods and operations and endanger the safety of CIA employees and those who dealt with them.&#039; 



--Jason Zengerle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought she went out with Ames and thats why they murdered the Deputy dircetor FSB before the Rice visit.  Maybe it was Rice&#8217;s degree that blew the covert CIA WMD training program at CIA </p>
<p>or was that Plame?</p>
<p>DOJ lost its law enforcement capabilities domestically(it&#8217;s in the CIA charter at Congress that CIA oeprates domestically and has badges like other law enforcement agencies) and internationally.  After DOJ was turned over to Porter Goss, they indict a US government employee.  It makes no sense, they report to the Director at CIA.  It is, at the least, a conflict of interest and, at worst, Plame following through on a foreign intelligence operation(yellowcake was a known red herring, hence Wilson and Spain) through DOJ, which now reports to CIA.  Lawyers can&#8217;t figure this out?</p>
<p>The only person indictable is Plame who confirmed she was a CIA Operations Officer, paramilitarily trained in &#8216;Vanity Fair.&#8217;  The assassinations of the Spanish operations officers in Iraq followed immediately and, later, the Madrid bombing and coup.  These were expected results Plame could not find in attacking US government officials.  &#8216;Vanity Fair the movie&#8217; is actually about these type of persons and their insanity.  Maybe she did&#8217;nt like the movie.?</p>
<p>Did Plame have a waiver or get a waiver from DOJ for do not prosecute?</p>
<p>The statement below can&#8217;t be more funny.  This is exactly what Plame did:</p>
<p>&#8216;The responsibilities of certain CIA employees required that their association with the CIA be kept secret. As a result, the fact that these individuals were employed by the CIA was classified. Disclosure of the fact that such individuals were employed by the CIA had the potential to damage the national security in ways that ranged from preventing the future use of those individuals in a covert capacity, to compromising intelligence gathering methods and operations and endanger the safety of CIA employees and those who dealt with them.&#8217; </p>
<p>&#8211;Jason Zengerle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

