God-Nerds
Since I’m already pissing off religious people today, I might as well get this one out of the way. Whenever I read articles like this…
Rare conditions could have conspired to create hard-to-see ice on the Sea of Galilee that a person could have walked on back when Jesus is said to have walked on water, a scientist said today.
The study, which examines a combination of favorable water and environmental conditions, proposes that Jesus could have walked on an isolated patch of floating ice on what is now known as Lake Kinneret in northern
Israel.Looking at temperature records of the Mediterranean Sea surface and using analytical ice and statistical models, scientists considered a small section of the cold freshwater surface of the lake. The area studied, about 10,000 square feet, was near salty springs that empty into it
…or this…
The senior researcher at St. Petersburg’s Institute of Oceanology spent six months studying the tides, winds and reefs common to the Red Sea, then developed a series of differential equations to chart out the parting of the waters, as detailed in Exodus 14.“And Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the Lord caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night, and made the sea dry land, and the waters were divided,” the King James Version of the Bible states.
Mr. Volzinger determined that if a strong wind blew at 30 meters per second over a shallow reef, then yes, it could have blown that reef dry. He also calculated it would have taken the fleeing Jews about four hours to make their crossing.
…I can’t help but think of this :

Whether you use a crucifix or a twenty-sided die, this stuff is just geeky.
4 comments »
Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Geeky, sure…but it’s also just friggin’ dumb. It’s a myth, ferchrissakes. Myths aren’t meant to be treated literally, no matter what the dumbass bible-worshipping pseudo-Christians may say. You’d think somebody would figure that out.
Comment by Tom Hilton — April 5, 2006 @ 8:59 am
Strange, isn’t it, how they always look for scientific explanations of things that are supposed to be accepted on faith?
Comment by Matt — April 6, 2006 @ 10:02 am
…I mean, isn’t that the whole idea of “faith”? That you don’t need scientific proof? Don’t tell me these people might actually have a smidgen of (gasp!) doubt in their mind…
Comment by Matt — April 6, 2006 @ 10:06 am
umm.. The point is that these are scientists, not religious types. Of course there is doubt in their minds.
I like it when people investigate myths to see what kind of grain of truth might be in them. Like volcanic activity at the site of Soddom and Gomorrah. I love that stuff. It chips away at the irrational bullshit that so many people persist to live in.
Comment by dAVE — April 7, 2006 @ 8:56 am