Google Snooze
I couldn’t agree with this sentiment from John Avarosis more (via Kos) :
Is it just me, or has Google News become useless? Their definition of “news sites” seems to include an ever increasing number of simply bizarre Web sites that aren’t even the top in their category of site. Meaning, they’ve tried to include blogs, but only some blogs, and many of the ones they have you’ll never have heard of, and many of the ones you have heard of are just plain bad. When I’m doing a news search, I want news site – not blogs, not left-wing conspiracy sites, or right-wing religious nutjobs. News. If they want a blog search enging, that’s fine too. But the current state of affairs has taken a great news search engine and turned it into a bunch of noise.
Equally bad is that Google’s news search doesn’t enough to make their results meaningful. It looks neat when you do a search for “Hastert”, “sexual predator”, and “cover-up” and Google News returns a few hundred entries, but when 95% of those results are the same repackaged stories from the Associated Press or Reuters, then you quickly realize that clicking around looking for interesting news is largely a waste of time. You’re better off finding a dozen or so news providers that do unique work and going to them instead.
3 comments »
Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


That’s why I’ve often favored Yahoo News, which uses human editors. At first, the site doesn’t appear to provide as much “news” as Google News, but once you get used to it, you love it.
Comment by E-Rock — October 14, 2006 @ 9:37 am
Don’t you mean “couldn’t agree more?
Comment by Andy — October 14, 2006 @ 5:33 pm
yah, but now they’ve got youtube!
Comment by skippy — October 14, 2006 @ 7:35 pm