<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Know-It-All</title>
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11381</link>
		<author>Les</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 03:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11381</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Why did Zidane head-butt his opponent in the World Cup final? Do the French not fight with their fists?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He's a soccer player!  No fist on the ball, no fist on the opponent.  Also, the Italian provoked him.  France should have won.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Why did Zidane head-butt his opponent in the World Cup final? Do the French not fight with their fists?
</p></blockquote>
<p>He&#8217;s a soccer player!  No fist on the ball, no fist on the opponent.  Also, the Italian provoked him.  France should have won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeB</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11380</link>
		<author>MikeB</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11380</guid>
		<description>Lilith is correct about lasers needing big power sources. But it's even worse than that.

A laser converts electricity into light with higher efficiency than any other device - semiconductor lasers can be more than 50% efficient!  Unfortunately, this means that for every watt of power you deliver to an enemy Stormtrooper/Cylon/Romulan, you have to absorb a watt of energy inside the laser. 

So you not only need a big power supply to run your laser - you also need a big refrigerator to keep it cool.

Gunpowder is far less efficient than a laser, but it has a far, far higher energy density than batteries. And, while a bullet being fired generates a ton of waste heat, the majority of that heat goes into the bullet, the shell casing, the vapor from the combustion, and the surrounding air - all of which are immediately thrown away. If lasers were so cheap that they could be used once before being thrown away, then they would make much better weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lilith is correct about lasers needing big power sources. But it&#8217;s even worse than that.</p>
<p>A laser converts electricity into light with higher efficiency than any other device - semiconductor lasers can be more than 50% efficient!  Unfortunately, this means that for every watt of power you deliver to an enemy Stormtrooper/Cylon/Romulan, you have to absorb a watt of energy inside the laser. </p>
<p>So you not only need a big power supply to run your laser - you also need a big refrigerator to keep it cool.</p>
<p>Gunpowder is far less efficient than a laser, but it has a far, far higher energy density than batteries. And, while a bullet being fired generates a ton of waste heat, the majority of that heat goes into the bullet, the shell casing, the vapor from the combustion, and the surrounding air - all of which are immediately thrown away. If lasers were so cheap that they could be used once before being thrown away, then they would make much better weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilith von Fraumench</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11379</link>
		<author>Lilith von Fraumench</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11379</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Lasers are now powerful and small (at least I think they are), so why don't our troops carry laser guns?&lt;/i&gt;

Because you'd need a fairly hefty power source to power relatively delicate, sometimes perishable, often toxic devices that may turn out to be much bulkier than the power source itself. But if you dropped the laser on someone, I'm sure it'd hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Lasers are now powerful and small (at least I think they are), so why don&#8217;t our troops carry laser guns?</i></p>
<p>Because you&#8217;d need a fairly hefty power source to power relatively delicate, sometimes perishable, often toxic devices that may turn out to be much bulkier than the power source itself. But if you dropped the laser on someone, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;d hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doobie</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11378</link>
		<author>Doobie</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11378</guid>
		<description>Greg, why don't you just put all those questions and answers--plus more, of course--in that upcoming book you're itching to write?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, why don&#8217;t you just put all those questions and answers&#8211;plus more, of course&#8211;in that upcoming book you&#8217;re itching to write?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11377</link>
		<author>Patrick</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11377</guid>
		<description>Or you could say that nothing comes after a 999 trillion, if you are using the real number system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could say that nothing comes after a 999 trillion, if you are using the real number system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raznor</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11376</link>
		<author>Raznor</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11376</guid>
		<description>Or 999,000,000,000,000,000,001 if you use the British numeral definition of a trillion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or 999,000,000,000,000,000,001 if you use the British numeral definition of a trillion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11375</link>
		<author>Aaron</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11375</guid>
		<description>I believe what follows 999 trillian is
999,000,000,000,001</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe what follows 999 trillian is<br />
999,000,000,000,001</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dAnimal</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11374</link>
		<author>dAnimal</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11374</guid>
		<description>Those chocolate-chip-cookie-dough-ice-cream cookies would have come out fine if the guy had baked them correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those chocolate-chip-cookie-dough-ice-cream cookies would have come out fine if the guy had baked them correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raznor</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11373</link>
		<author>Raznor</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11373</guid>
		<description>Adding- yeah I know.  I just spend much of my free time thinking about this sort of stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding- yeah I know.  I just spend much of my free time thinking about this sort of stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raznor</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11372</link>
		<author>Raznor</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2006/12/20/know-it-all/#comment-11372</guid>
		<description>"I have been pondering this situation for as long as I can remember (maybe age 7-8) and it drives me nuts. It makes me feel like my head will implode if I think any harder. Is the universe infinite? It must end somewhere. But when it ends … there must be something on the other side … right?"

Well, we can represent the universe as a 3-dimensional &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold" rel="nofollow"&gt;manifold&lt;/a&gt;.  But we currently know very little about 3-dimensional manifolds that beyond properties of manifolds in general, especially when compared to our knowledge of 3-dimensional manifolds, like spheres and toroids.  There is much work being currently done on 3 dimensional manifolds, but even with a greater knowledge, in order to gather enough data to determine the exact shape of the universe would likely take until long after the sun has burnt out.

Still, it is possible for the universe to be bounded but not have an edge.  The universe could be a hypersphere, much like the surface of the earth.  There's only a finite amount of space on the earth, but you could walk in a straight line from any point on the earth and continue in that direction ad infinitum.  That's because the surface of the earth is a 2-dimensional space that is bent in 3-dimensional space as a sphere.  So too, imagine the universe as a 3-dimensional space bent in 4-dimensional space as a hypersphere.  This is the model of the universe it seems most physicists consider if they in fact care about the overall shape of the universe.  Me, I like to think the the universe is a 3-torus, just cos that would be cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have been pondering this situation for as long as I can remember (maybe age 7-8) and it drives me nuts. It makes me feel like my head will implode if I think any harder. Is the universe infinite? It must end somewhere. But when it ends … there must be something on the other side … right?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, we can represent the universe as a 3-dimensional <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold" rel="nofollow">manifold</a>.  But we currently know very little about 3-dimensional manifolds that beyond properties of manifolds in general, especially when compared to our knowledge of 3-dimensional manifolds, like spheres and toroids.  There is much work being currently done on 3 dimensional manifolds, but even with a greater knowledge, in order to gather enough data to determine the exact shape of the universe would likely take until long after the sun has burnt out.</p>
<p>Still, it is possible for the universe to be bounded but not have an edge.  The universe could be a hypersphere, much like the surface of the earth.  There&#8217;s only a finite amount of space on the earth, but you could walk in a straight line from any point on the earth and continue in that direction ad infinitum.  That&#8217;s because the surface of the earth is a 2-dimensional space that is bent in 3-dimensional space as a sphere.  So too, imagine the universe as a 3-dimensional space bent in 4-dimensional space as a hypersphere.  This is the model of the universe it seems most physicists consider if they in fact care about the overall shape of the universe.  Me, I like to think the the universe is a 3-torus, just cos that would be cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
