<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;A man-animal getting leverage over a Psychlo?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:58:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/comment-page-1/#comment-13829</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/#comment-13829</guid>
		<description>Its a book damn it, leave it at that. And it reads, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a book damn it, leave it at that. And it reads, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lermanet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/comment-page-1/#comment-12996</link>
		<dc:creator>Lermanet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 04:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/#comment-12996</guid>
		<description>Even political officials fall for this confidence game run by a totalitarian group. Search Google for $cientology front groups, a primary source of income, they change the name to scam good-natured people.

Watch for those stress test and e-meter tables - Look how do this!
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lermanet.com/exit/hubbard-the-hypnotist9.htm&quot; title=&quot;Imagine a Letter from L Ron Hubbard&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even political officials fall for this confidence game run by a totalitarian group. Search Google for $cientology front groups, a primary source of income, they change the name to scam good-natured people.</p>
<p>Watch for those stress test and e-meter tables &#8211; Look how do this!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lermanet.com/exit/hubbard-the-hypnotist9.htm" title="Imagine a Letter from L Ron Hubbard" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/comment-page-1/#comment-12140</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/#comment-12140</guid>
		<description>Hey, I like that book too.  I think of it as mind candy.  The movie, by the way, sucks, but I don&#039;t think most people have the attention span to keep up with the book.  Then again, most people don&#039;t have the attention span to keep up with Stephen King&#039;s longer books either.  (Which are better-written, but BE is still a decent book for all that.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I like that book too.  I think of it as mind candy.  The movie, by the way, sucks, but I don&#8217;t think most people have the attention span to keep up with the book.  Then again, most people don&#8217;t have the attention span to keep up with Stephen King&#8217;s longer books either.  (Which are better-written, but BE is still a decent book for all that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Osborne</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/comment-page-1/#comment-12023</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 16:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/#comment-12023</guid>
		<description>Maybe Mr. Romney thought that sounding like a person of superior intellect would dash to pieces any chance to become what the network chatterers breathlessly and constantly call &quot;themostpowerfulmanintheworld&quot;. After all, the current owner of that dubious title didn&#039;t obtain it by appearing intelligent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Mr. Romney thought that sounding like a person of superior intellect would dash to pieces any chance to become what the network chatterers breathlessly and constantly call &#8220;themostpowerfulmanintheworld&#8221;. After all, the current owner of that dubious title didn&#8217;t obtain it by appearing intelligent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gershowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/comment-page-1/#comment-11927</link>
		<dc:creator>Gershowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 02:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/#comment-11927</guid>
		<description>Piers Anthony?  I haven&#039;t liked his books since I was a horny 12-year old nerd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piers Anthony?  I haven&#8217;t liked his books since I was a horny 12-year old nerd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/comment-page-1/#comment-11920</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 19:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/#comment-11920</guid>
		<description>Okay, so I&#039;ll admit it, I&#039;ve read it. And even more embarrassingly, when I was younger and less well read, I thought it wasn&#039;t half bad. Nowadays, I think it has one, and exactly one, redeeming quality (which also happens, almost, to be somewhat of an original idea): In the second half of the book, the earthlings, having utterly annihilated the bad guys, and earth being the last remaining property owned by the bad guys, the earthlings assume all of the bad guys&#039; debts. Suddenly, a group of intergalactic bankers and loan managers show up and attempt to foreclose on earth and force the population into debt slavery in compensation for the lost credit. It&#039;s actually an interesting idea.

Unfortunately, as Greg&#039;s excerpt shows, it&#039;s an interesting idea buried under a swamp of hackneyed, 3rd rate shite. I hate to break it to the Scientologists, but L. Ron Hubbard was not a good writer, not even remotely. His technique was, essentially, to date rape the English language and then convince himself afterward that he made sweet love to it. It&#039;s a terrible thing to see, all the worse because his followers in the Church of Scientology constantly laud his literary powers as if he was the second coming of H.G. Welles. 

Then again, I suspect even they know what a terrible writer he is. At the L. Ron Hubbard Life Exhibition in Hollywood, (which every single one of you ought to see once before you die. it&#039;s easily the single most hilarious thing in the entire world,) during the part of the tour that discusses his writing career, it discusses his attempt to break into screenwriting. Long Story short, he came out and got paid shit wages for a couple of shitty movies, couldn&#039;t make a living, called it a success and quit. That&#039;s an easy enough story to tell, right? Hell, no one&#039;s perfect after all.

Except, unfortunately for sanity and reason, the Cult of Scientology considers L. Ron to be the one exception the nobody&#039;s perfect rule. (He is the &quot;friend of Mankind, after all,) They have no choice but to depict his every experience as the casual display of godly perfection. Unfortunately, there&#039;s too much documentary evidence for them to lie about his screenwriting career like they do about his Military Career and Childhood, so they&#039;re forced to give what I consider to be the most amazingly lame praise in the history of sycophancy. At the end of this section of the tour, after the brief description of L. Ron&#039;s stillborn career as a screenwriter, the VO narrator says, quote:

&quot;Yes, Hollywood Screenwriting. One of the many areas in which L. Ron. Hubbard was a &lt;i&gt;true professional&lt;/i&gt;!&quot;

Anyhoo, you want my opinion? He didn&#039;t write this, or, he was halfway through it when he died and one of the ghostwriters took over for him. Because there are striking differences in tone and prose style throughout. Of course, it could just be that L. Ron. was a crazy, drug addled sociopath. Of course, I only say this as a joke because I&#039;d hate to be sued by the Scientologists. I&#039;m just kidding guys, I swear!

One last thing:

&quot;But then, I like many different books. Douglas Adams Hitchhiker’s trilogy, Hubbard’s Battlefield Earth and Mission Earth series, Alan Dean Foster’s Spellsinger series, Piers Anthony’s Blue Adept, etc…&quot;
Please don&#039;t Put Adams in with those hacks. Please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so I&#8217;ll admit it, I&#8217;ve read it. And even more embarrassingly, when I was younger and less well read, I thought it wasn&#8217;t half bad. Nowadays, I think it has one, and exactly one, redeeming quality (which also happens, almost, to be somewhat of an original idea): In the second half of the book, the earthlings, having utterly annihilated the bad guys, and earth being the last remaining property owned by the bad guys, the earthlings assume all of the bad guys&#8217; debts. Suddenly, a group of intergalactic bankers and loan managers show up and attempt to foreclose on earth and force the population into debt slavery in compensation for the lost credit. It&#8217;s actually an interesting idea.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, as Greg&#8217;s excerpt shows, it&#8217;s an interesting idea buried under a swamp of hackneyed, 3rd rate shite. I hate to break it to the Scientologists, but L. Ron Hubbard was not a good writer, not even remotely. His technique was, essentially, to date rape the English language and then convince himself afterward that he made sweet love to it. It&#8217;s a terrible thing to see, all the worse because his followers in the Church of Scientology constantly laud his literary powers as if he was the second coming of H.G. Welles. </p>
<p>Then again, I suspect even they know what a terrible writer he is. At the L. Ron Hubbard Life Exhibition in Hollywood, (which every single one of you ought to see once before you die. it&#8217;s easily the single most hilarious thing in the entire world,) during the part of the tour that discusses his writing career, it discusses his attempt to break into screenwriting. Long Story short, he came out and got paid shit wages for a couple of shitty movies, couldn&#8217;t make a living, called it a success and quit. That&#8217;s an easy enough story to tell, right? Hell, no one&#8217;s perfect after all.</p>
<p>Except, unfortunately for sanity and reason, the Cult of Scientology considers L. Ron to be the one exception the nobody&#8217;s perfect rule. (He is the &#8220;friend of Mankind, after all,) They have no choice but to depict his every experience as the casual display of godly perfection. Unfortunately, there&#8217;s too much documentary evidence for them to lie about his screenwriting career like they do about his Military Career and Childhood, so they&#8217;re forced to give what I consider to be the most amazingly lame praise in the history of sycophancy. At the end of this section of the tour, after the brief description of L. Ron&#8217;s stillborn career as a screenwriter, the VO narrator says, quote:</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, Hollywood Screenwriting. One of the many areas in which L. Ron. Hubbard was a <i>true professional</i>!&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyhoo, you want my opinion? He didn&#8217;t write this, or, he was halfway through it when he died and one of the ghostwriters took over for him. Because there are striking differences in tone and prose style throughout. Of course, it could just be that L. Ron. was a crazy, drug addled sociopath. Of course, I only say this as a joke because I&#8217;d hate to be sued by the Scientologists. I&#8217;m just kidding guys, I swear!</p>
<p>One last thing:</p>
<p>&#8220;But then, I like many different books. Douglas Adams Hitchhiker’s trilogy, Hubbard’s Battlefield Earth and Mission Earth series, Alan Dean Foster’s Spellsinger series, Piers Anthony’s Blue Adept, etc…&#8221;<br />
Please don&#8217;t Put Adams in with those hacks. Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/comment-page-1/#comment-11919</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/#comment-11919</guid>
		<description>*shrug* no problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*shrug* no problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/comment-page-1/#comment-11913</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/#comment-11913</guid>
		<description>This was the worst piece of crap I ever read in my life, and that&#039;s saying quite a lot.  The writing was so ridiculously bad, I literally threw this book in the trash after getting halfway through.  Now I love books in general, and always have a high regard for the printed word, so I would normally take a used book to a used bookstore, or donate it to the library or goodwill.  But I was so worried that someone else might actually *read* this trash, that I buried it in the bottom of a trash bin.  

It&#039;s not just a cheesy bit of sci-fi.  I love sci-fi, and even take in the old pulp stuff with interest, because it reflects the politics and social mores of the early-to-mid 20th century quite well.  To read pulp sci-fi is to explore the history of our culture.  I don&#039;t always like the stories, but I respect them, and their authors.  Hubbard was not a writer.  The above excerpt is a good reflection of this statement.  He was a profound manipulator of the gullible, to be sure, but he had no talent for prose.

The only thing I can&#039;t figure out is how I also managed to take in the movie, which also stank.  I&#039;ve been mulling this one over for years.  Surely one would have steered me away from the other?!?  I can&#039;t recall specifically, but I believe I saw the movie first.  Maybe I was hoping the book would be better.

And Nick, no offense, but as religions go, LDS is no better than Scientology.  Both involve brainwashing via an invented mythology, by a cryptic elder &quot;prophet&quot; whose main agenda was control of the masses.  Joseph Smith and L. Ron Hubbard could have been pals, had they been contemporaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the worst piece of crap I ever read in my life, and that&#8217;s saying quite a lot.  The writing was so ridiculously bad, I literally threw this book in the trash after getting halfway through.  Now I love books in general, and always have a high regard for the printed word, so I would normally take a used book to a used bookstore, or donate it to the library or goodwill.  But I was so worried that someone else might actually *read* this trash, that I buried it in the bottom of a trash bin.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just a cheesy bit of sci-fi.  I love sci-fi, and even take in the old pulp stuff with interest, because it reflects the politics and social mores of the early-to-mid 20th century quite well.  To read pulp sci-fi is to explore the history of our culture.  I don&#8217;t always like the stories, but I respect them, and their authors.  Hubbard was not a writer.  The above excerpt is a good reflection of this statement.  He was a profound manipulator of the gullible, to be sure, but he had no talent for prose.</p>
<p>The only thing I can&#8217;t figure out is how I also managed to take in the movie, which also stank.  I&#8217;ve been mulling this one over for years.  Surely one would have steered me away from the other?!?  I can&#8217;t recall specifically, but I believe I saw the movie first.  Maybe I was hoping the book would be better.</p>
<p>And Nick, no offense, but as religions go, LDS is no better than Scientology.  Both involve brainwashing via an invented mythology, by a cryptic elder &#8220;prophet&#8221; whose main agenda was control of the masses.  Joseph Smith and L. Ron Hubbard could have been pals, had they been contemporaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/comment-page-1/#comment-11906</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 14:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/#comment-11906</guid>
		<description>Well, what&#039;s good to one person may be crap to another.  This is the first time I&#039;ve met others who have actually read the book, and everyone seems to hate it or think of it as just a cheesy sci-fi, so I am just surprised.  I respect people&#039;s hatred of it.

But what gets me is that everyone is picking up on the NAME of the book, and assume that it perfectly reflects his ideaology.  If anyone actually read the book, they see it has nothing to do with mankind-led conflict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, what&#8217;s good to one person may be crap to another.  This is the first time I&#8217;ve met others who have actually read the book, and everyone seems to hate it or think of it as just a cheesy sci-fi, so I am just surprised.  I respect people&#8217;s hatred of it.</p>
<p>But what gets me is that everyone is picking up on the NAME of the book, and assume that it perfectly reflects his ideaology.  If anyone actually read the book, they see it has nothing to do with mankind-led conflict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: briantologist</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/comment-page-1/#comment-11905</link>
		<dc:creator>briantologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 14:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2007/05/02/a-man-animal-getting-leverage-over-a-psychlo/#comment-11905</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

Good? Good, you say? Like, compared to what? I think the nicest thing I can think of to say about that is that it&#039;s funnier than most nutrition information.

Although, in all fairness, I will now admit that the phrase &quot;Butt and crap story&quot; is quickly becoming one of my favorites. So maybe he&#039;s got a point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Good? Good, you say? Like, compared to what? I think the nicest thing I can think of to say about that is that it&#8217;s funnier than most nutrition information.</p>
<p>Although, in all fairness, I will now admit that the phrase &#8220;Butt and crap story&#8221; is quickly becoming one of my favorites. So maybe he&#8217;s got a point.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
