Airtight Logic
Thursday, May 10th, 2007One of the great works of philosophy that has always grated on my nerves is Rene Descartes “Meditations on First Philosophy”. His proof of God’s existence is ridiculous :
There only remains, therefore, the idea of God, in which I must consider whether there is anything that cannot be supposed to originate with myself. By the name God, I understand a substance infinite, [eternal, immutable], independent, all-knowing, all-powerful, and by which I myself, and every other thing that exists, if any such there be, were created. But these properties are so great and excellent, that the more attentively I consider them the less I feel persuaded that the idea I have of them owes its origin to myself alone And thus it is absolutely necessary to conclude, from all that I have before said, that God exists.
There’s no way I could come up with the idea of an all-knowing, all-powerful being, so God must have planted the idea there himself. To me, this has always seemed like the foundation for all of those cheezy books sold in Christian bookstores in which a scientist or journalist offers conclusive “proof” that God exists and is the creator of everything we see (as if blind faith were something that you can argue your way into or out of).
Fast forward 366 years and there’s an even more powerful argument to prove the existence of God from former sitcom star Kirk Cameron :
“Darwin said in order to prove evolution, which is the #1 alternative to God, you’ve gotta be able to prove transitional forms. One animal transitioning into another. And all through the fossil record and life, we don’t find one of these…a croco-duck.”

Nice try Descartes, but with the croco-duck and finding out that bananas are an “atheist’s nightmare”, I’m finally convinced. Amen.








