Primary Predictions

With the Iowa caucuses hours away, here’s my guesses as to how the primaries will play out. Although these are simply guesses tinted by my own biases and unsupportable by empirical evidence, I’ll resist the urge to label these “conventional wisdom”. Since I’m the same guy who called “bullshit” on a poll predicting a Kerry win in Iowa four years ago, take the following with a grain of salt.

On the Democratic side, I think Edwards is gonna take Iowa in an upset. The first round of caucusing may resemble the polls we’ve seen, but I think Edwards is going to be a much more attractive second pick candidate than Clinton or Obama. I can’t imagine Hillary would be a popular second round pick. People already know a lot about her and have made up their minds before caucusing. Of the top three, I think her support is as solid as it’s gonna get. Obama, on the other hand, is a much more charismatic presence on the campaign trail, but I doubt that his caucus-going supporters will be able to impress undecideds with platitudes about “hope” and “change”.

Another thing working in Edwards favor is that Iowa has been framed as a two-person race for a while between Clinton and Obama. The caucuses four years ago were also a two way race between Dean (who placed a distant third) and Gephardt (who dropped out that night). If this year plays out the same way, Edwards could sneak up the middle as a choice that combines some of the most appealing qualities of the top two. While he hasn’t been around Washington as long as Clinton, his role in the 2004 campaign gives him a one-up in the “experience” area against Obama (whose last election was against a candidate nobody expected to win). On the other hand, when it comes to Obama’s “Audacity of Hope” campaign-style, Edwards campaign is every bit as status-quo shattering and would provide just as great a contrast with the Clinton campaign.

If Edwards does win in Iowa, I think it’ll mark the beginning of the end for Obama. For one, it would give the press a new storyline about the Obama campaign being a well-funded hype machine that couldn’t translate its enthusiasm into votes (like Dean in ‘04). Moreover, it’ll give the Edwards campaign a breath of fresh air and go a long way towards establishing him as the “not-Hillary candidate” (though I could easily see the same working in reverse if Obama beats Edwards).

On the Republican side, I think Ron Paul is going to win because he’s the only candidate that cares about the constitution and freedom. Also, his supporters rented him a blimp.

Okay, let’s try this again…

On the Republican side, I think Huckabee is going to probably win Iowa by default. More important than Huckabee winning, though, is that I think Mitt Romney is going to get crushed. Not just because he’s a transparent phony who’s trying to buy the election (which caucus-goers will resent), but he really sucks at pandering to his base. He’s terrible at it. For example, check out how he slammed Huckabee earlier today :

Mitt Romney, who is spending the final day before the caucuses jetting around Iowa, is hitting rival Mike Huckabee for abandoning the Hawkeye State on caucus eve to make an appearance on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno.

“Well, frankly my focus is on the caucuses here in Iowa. I think Mike is more concerned about the caucus in Los Angeles,” Romney told voters at Bettendorf Middle School.

Any decent Republican strategist would see Huckabee’s caucus-eve trip as a golden opportunity to bash Hollywood and kiss Iowans asses by referring to their neck of the woods as the “real America”, but the best Romney could come up with was some clumsy statement about “the caucus in Los Angeles”. Huh??

Another thing working against Romney is that he’s a Mormon. Although most conservative voters would have a hard time admitting to a pollster that they think the LDS church is a weird (I prefer to think of it as a fanfic version of Christianity), I think a lot of Iowans who might otherwise vote for Mitt will find convenient reasons not to support him. While his flip-flopping may be the official reason for his fall, I think old-fashioned religious bigotry will be his undoing. Since he decided to make his faith a selling point in the campaign, his downfall will be hilarious to watch. Live by the cross, die by the cross.

The other big news on the GOP side will be McCain having a surprisingly strong showing in Iowa that will position him to win New Hampshire and turn the GOP primary into a two-man race with Huckabee. Giuliani’s irrelevance in the early primaries will leave him virtually shut out of the press coverage aside from the occasional “Where are they now?” piece. Like the Dems four years ago, Republicans are in an “anyone but ____” mode and will ultimately go with the candidate they think has the strongest chance of beating the Democrats. That’s why I think “Maverick” McCain is going to beat Huckabee because the corporate whores who own the GOP won’t allow the nominee to be some hick who might raise taxes.

…then again, I could be wrong.


posted by greg on January 2, 2008 @ 11:33 pm

3 comments »

  1. i think edwards will win in iowa icant amagin voting for anyone else as an old iowan farmer isure hope he wins

    Comment by donald price — January 3, 2008 @ 9:09 am

  2. …then again, I could be wrong.

    You’re wrong.

    …adding that I say it without disful meaning. Just that I’m glad both Rudy Mussoliani and Saint John tanked. Strangley, Romney came in second but not to worry – his campaign is doomed. It’s not that conservative Christians think his religion is weird – it’s that they think his religion is a hellish abomination, that it is literally a satanic cult. It’s not polite to say so, but then, most of them won’t admit they feel the same way about the Pope too.

    Oddly, Fred Thompson outperformed Mussoliani, and Saint John. My thinking is that the crushing defeat of the bloodlust twins reflects a strong desire on the part of Rank and File republicans to essentially pretend the Bush years didn’t happen. We’ve already seen how the republican candidates have been running their primary campaigns as though Hillary is the incumbant instead of Bush. John and Rudy are the two candidates most closely associated with 9/11 and all related policies. Plus, Saint John isn’t fucking insane about torturing people.

    Hopefully, the dems won’t be a bunch of snivelling cowards, and will actually do their duty and constantly remind the country that the republicans have been in charge. Hence the mess.

    Speaking of Hillary, I can’t tell you how happy I am that she came in third. for the first time in months I kind of feel like she might not be the nominee.

    Comment by Ross — January 3, 2008 @ 9:39 pm

  3. Regarding Huckabee, we should all be very concerned about what it says re: the political clout of people who are literally not rational and should not be politically active. But we can discuss those matter tomorrow. In the meantime, it fills me with glee watching Republicans pretend they haven’t been the party of people like him since at least the late 70s.

    They’ve bent over backwards giving the funduhmentalists everything they want. Or at least trying to in good faith. But of course now they’re learning that Christian funduhmentalism is box office poison and they’re desperately trying to save the brand from Bush without having to specificially repudiate him. So they’re terrified of Huckabee.

    I am too. Not because if he wins it basically legitmizes people who reject all science and morality prior to 1650. All the republicans are psychopaths at this point. I’m worried because the new law is that Christians are allowed to talk about “faith” all the time, they’re allowed to impune the moral decency of Secular people and anyone else, and no one is allowed to criticize them because of the magical speacialness of their religious beliefs. So Huck is going to get away with saying a lot of very terrifying shi-er, stuff, with expressing some very odious beliefs, and because the word faith is apparently a magical political talisman, no one will be able to criticize his odious beliefs, nor examine the faith behind those beliefs.

    Of course, the magical power of the word “faith” only works if you’re a conservative Christian or, during an election year, a token Muslim. (And only if you’re allowing yourself to be used as a prop for a conservative Christian.) It definitely doesn’t apply to Mormons. TBSS I suppose.

    But it’s also Hi-larious, you know, like the end of Dr. Strangelove. So much dirty laundry is going to come out if Huck wins the nomination. Maybe we can finally have a conversation about how crazy ass crazy right wingers were during the Clinton years, and how that crazy ass craziness was just warm up for current events.

    Comment by Ross — January 3, 2008 @ 10:03 pm

Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post or for TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)