<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Clinton Lie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-15685</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/#comment-15685</guid>
		<description>Aargh! You humorless people -- don't you recognize a joke when you see it? Sheesh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aargh! You humorless people &#8212; don&#8217;t you recognize a joke when you see it? Sheesh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac Priestley</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-15674</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac Priestley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/#comment-15674</guid>
		<description>Slashfilm didn't interview her.  In the comments I asked the poster what his sources were and he said he culled them from various other interviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slashfilm didn&#8217;t interview her.  In the comments I asked the poster what his sources were and he said he culled them from various other interviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith H.</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-15669</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/#comment-15669</guid>
		<description>Man...this Republican is liking Obama more and more. He has great taste in movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man&#8230;this Republican is liking Obama more and more. He has great taste in movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doobie</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-15668</link>
		<dc:creator>Doobie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/#comment-15668</guid>
		<description>If Hillary were to become president, we would be entering the third decade of the same two families running the country. That's also scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Hillary were to become president, we would be entering the third decade of the same two families running the country. That&#8217;s also scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildsoda</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-15667</link>
		<dc:creator>wildsoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 03:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/03/28/another-clinton-lie/#comment-15667</guid>
		<description>Are you really taking her comment that seriously? It's pretty obvious that she was merely offering a quip to say that she would keep fighting for the nomination even if it took a long time. Besides, your logic is weak regardless. A person can like long movies without requiring that her three favorite movies actually be long films themselves. Her fourth favorite movie could be three hours long, for all you know.

Either way, she certainly can't be rightly accused of lying in this instance. I think we'd be better off saving the vitriol for McCain, anyway. The idea of his becoming president is a lot scarier than that of Clinton's, by any margin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you really taking her comment that seriously? It&#8217;s pretty obvious that she was merely offering a quip to say that she would keep fighting for the nomination even if it took a long time. Besides, your logic is weak regardless. A person can like long movies without requiring that her three favorite movies actually be long films themselves. Her fourth favorite movie could be three hours long, for all you know.</p>
<p>Either way, she certainly can&#8217;t be rightly accused of lying in this instance. I think we&#8217;d be better off saving the vitriol for McCain, anyway. The idea of his becoming president is a lot scarier than that of Clinton&#8217;s, by any margin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
