Comments on: Shouldn’t Every Cabinet Member Care About Ending Poverty? http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/04/05/shouldnt-every-cabinet-member-care-about-ending-poverty/ Just another WordPress weblog Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:58:51 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Rod M http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/04/05/shouldnt-every-cabinet-member-care-about-ending-poverty/comment-page-1/#comment-15718 Rod M Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:17:51 +0000 http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/04/05/shouldnt-every-cabinet-member-care-about-ending-poverty/#comment-15718 I personally am a fan of the free market theory...unfortunately it would only work if people were basically good, and pretty smart. Unfortunately people are greedy and dumb, so they will do what they can to lock their own power, rather than keep it free market. So it wont really work. What she needs instead of a "povery czar" is someone whose job is to decrease the rich poor/gap...and actually have them work with Congress and the Fed. Maybe...the VP? I personally am a fan of the free market theory…unfortunately it would only work if people were basically good, and pretty smart. Unfortunately people are greedy and dumb, so they will do what they can to lock their own power, rather than keep it free market. So it wont really work. What she needs instead of a “povery czar” is someone whose job is to decrease the rich poor/gap…and actually have them work with Congress and the Fed. Maybe…the VP?

]]> By: Doobie http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/04/05/shouldnt-every-cabinet-member-care-about-ending-poverty/comment-page-1/#comment-15702 Doobie Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:09:15 +0000 http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/04/05/shouldnt-every-cabinet-member-care-about-ending-poverty/#comment-15702 It’s amazing how some still buy into the myth of free-market infallibility, especially in the wake of the recent lead-toy recalls and Bear Stearns collapse. It’s the economic equivalent of religious fundamentalism. It’s amazing how some still buy into the myth of free-market infallibility, especially in the wake of the recent lead-toy recalls and Bear Stearns collapse. It’s the economic equivalent of religious fundamentalism.

]]> By: pogo http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/04/05/shouldnt-every-cabinet-member-care-about-ending-poverty/comment-page-1/#comment-15693 pogo Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:52:29 +0000 http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/04/05/shouldnt-every-cabinet-member-care-about-ending-poverty/#comment-15693 Our "leaders",really love royale titles,such as czar,which is defined in wikipedia as,"a ruler who has the same rank as a Roman or Byzantine emperor (or, according to Byzantine ideology, the most elevated position adjacent to the one held by the Byzantine monarch) due to recognition by another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official " Senator Clinton's new position should be called "The Emperor of the impoverished",a simi-divine diety who rules America's impoverished,a beauricratic Caesar out to "save" the poor.Senator Clinton should read the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE,The Constitution,and the Bill of Rights,and discover the founding fathers thoughts on monarchy,royalist,and emperors.America's poor already have all the divine titled do-gooders,overseerers,and emperors,we can stand. Our “leaders”,really love royale titles,such as czar,which is defined in wikipedia as,”a ruler who has the same rank as a Roman or Byzantine emperor (or, according to Byzantine ideology, the most elevated position adjacent to the one held by the Byzantine monarch) due to recognition by another emperor or a supreme ecclesiastical official ”
Senator Clinton’s new position should be called “The Emperor of the impoverished”,a simi-divine diety who rules America’s impoverished,a beauricratic Caesar out to “save” the poor.Senator Clinton should read the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE,The Constitution,and the Bill of Rights,and discover the founding fathers thoughts on monarchy,royalist,and emperors.America’s poor already have all the divine titled do-gooders,overseerers,and emperors,we can stand.

]]> By: greg http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/04/05/shouldnt-every-cabinet-member-care-about-ending-poverty/comment-page-1/#comment-15692 greg Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:32:19 +0000 http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/04/05/shouldnt-every-cabinet-member-care-about-ending-poverty/#comment-15692 <blockquote>A TOTALLY free market, with no government intervention, would tend to always find a balance in which people were only out of work very temporarily, unless they want to be out of work.</blockquote>So would the Gilded Age be the exception that "proves" the rule, or simply proof that free market zealots are idiots who just want their taxes lowered?

A TOTALLY free market, with no government intervention, would tend to always find a balance in which people were only out of work very temporarily, unless they want to be out of work.

So would the Gilded Age be the exception that “proves” the rule, or simply proof that free market zealots are idiots who just want their taxes lowered?

]]> By: Christian Prophet http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/04/05/shouldnt-every-cabinet-member-care-about-ending-poverty/comment-page-1/#comment-15690 Christian Prophet Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:18:10 +0000 http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/04/05/shouldnt-every-cabinet-member-care-about-ending-poverty/#comment-15690 As near as I can tell, GOVERNMENTS cause poverty. A TOTALLY free market, with no government intervention, would tend to always find a balance in which people were only out of work very temporarily, unless they want to be out of work. As for Clinton, see: http://miraclesdaily.blogspot.com/ As near as I can tell, GOVERNMENTS cause poverty. A TOTALLY free market, with no government intervention, would tend to always find a balance in which people were only out of work very temporarily, unless they want to be out of work. As for Clinton, see:
http://miraclesdaily.blogspot.com/

]]>