<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Basic Lesson In Reading Comprehension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:04:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-17239</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/#comment-17239</guid>
		<description>Where would dumbass John McCain be without his rich wife t depend on? He would be a total failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where would dumbass John McCain be without his rich wife t depend on? He would be a total failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-16880</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/#comment-16880</guid>
		<description>Like Ron said, you know they don&#039;t actually believe this, they were just manufacturing outrage so they wouldn&#039;t have to talk about issues and so Obama would have to respond. It&#039;s their SOP and it is effective. It keeps the Dems on the defense instead of the offense. We all know this.

But, it&#039;s like I always say - I don&#039;t have the imagination to be a Republican. I could never have twisted Obama&#039;s innocent comment to come up with something this outlandish! It is something of an art - sick and twisted, but still an art...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Ron said, you know they don&#8217;t actually believe this, they were just manufacturing outrage so they wouldn&#8217;t have to talk about issues and so Obama would have to respond. It&#8217;s their SOP and it is effective. It keeps the Dems on the defense instead of the offense. We all know this.</p>
<p>But, it&#8217;s like I always say &#8211; I don&#8217;t have the imagination to be a Republican. I could never have twisted Obama&#8217;s innocent comment to come up with something this outlandish! It is something of an art &#8211; sick and twisted, but still an art&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Bootyman</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-16799</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Bootyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/#comment-16799</guid>
		<description>Come on. Please. The reason for this is not that McCain&#039;s camp believes Obama was comparing Palin to a pig but to create the meme that Obama was comparing Palin to a pig. This worked. Right wing radio and Fox news have picked it up. Hanity, O&#039;Reilly, Limbaugh, Savage, Coulter etc. have all picked it up and are running with it. Just throwing a little red meat out there so the wolves can tear it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on. Please. The reason for this is not that McCain&#8217;s camp believes Obama was comparing Palin to a pig but to create the meme that Obama was comparing Palin to a pig. This worked. Right wing radio and Fox news have picked it up. Hanity, O&#8217;Reilly, Limbaugh, Savage, Coulter etc. have all picked it up and are running with it. Just throwing a little red meat out there so the wolves can tear it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doobie</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-16796</link>
		<dc:creator>Doobie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/#comment-16796</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;...let’s put aside questions that have been raised regarding his campaign and take as a given that John McCain is an honorable, trustworthy person...&lt;/i&gt;

Perhaps honorable, but...he can&#039;t even define honor:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;There&#039;s a theme that recurs in your books and your speeches, both about putting country first but also about honor. I wonder if you could define honor for us?&lt;/b&gt;
Read it in my books. 

&lt;b&gt;I&#039;ve read your books.&lt;/b&gt;
No, I&#039;m not going to define it. 

&lt;b&gt;But honor in politics?&lt;/b&gt;
I defined it in five books. Read my books.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1836909,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230;let’s put aside questions that have been raised regarding his campaign and take as a given that John McCain is an honorable, trustworthy person&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Perhaps honorable, but&#8230;he can&#8217;t even define honor:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>There&#8217;s a theme that recurs in your books and your speeches, both about putting country first but also about honor. I wonder if you could define honor for us?</b><br />
Read it in my books. </p>
<p><b>I&#8217;ve read your books.</b><br />
No, I&#8217;m not going to define it. </p>
<p><b>But honor in politics?</b><br />
I defined it in five books. Read my books.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1836909,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1836909,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamachanda</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-16790</link>
		<dc:creator>kamachanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/#comment-16790</guid>
		<description>If Barack Obama is stealing John McCain&#039;s refrain &quot;you can put lipstick on a pig, but it&#039;s still a pig&quot; to refer to Sarah Palin, then Senator Obama owes an apology to pigs everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Barack Obama is stealing John McCain&#8217;s refrain &#8220;you can put lipstick on a pig, but it&#8217;s still a pig&#8221; to refer to Sarah Palin, then Senator Obama owes an apology to pigs everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangehairboy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/comment-page-1/#comment-16789</link>
		<dc:creator>orangehairboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/09/10/a-basic-lesson-in-reading-comprehension/#comment-16789</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s worse is that McCain basically used the same analogy himself in the recent past.  Of course, we know it&#039;s only offensive hate-mongering if Democrats say something that can be twisted out of context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s worse is that McCain basically used the same analogy himself in the recent past.  Of course, we know it&#8217;s only offensive hate-mongering if Democrats say something that can be twisted out of context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

