<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who The Hell Is Caroline Kennedy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blagojevich defies all reason and logic and appoints Roland Burris to replace Obama for Illinois&#8217;s Senate seat &#171; Nuclear Rays From My Halogen Haze</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/comment-page-1/#comment-20359</link>
		<dc:creator>Blagojevich defies all reason and logic and appoints Roland Burris to replace Obama for Illinois&#8217;s Senate seat &#171; Nuclear Rays From My Halogen Haze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/?p=3189#comment-20359</guid>
		<description>[...] a weird way, a choice like the one made in New York with Caroline Kennedy would actually make better sense in Illinois now.  A system as tainted with scandal as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a weird way, a choice like the one made in New York with Caroline Kennedy would actually make better sense in Illinois now.  A system as tainted with scandal as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McCampbell</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/comment-page-1/#comment-20285</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCampbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/?p=3189#comment-20285</guid>
		<description>Dear greg, Chris, Cervantes, and Doobie,

Yeah, Wikipedia is a real credible source.  Liz Holtzman seems to  me like the best candidate, and Mario Cuomo&#039;s son Andrew may be second, but you could read Ms. Kennedy&#039;s book, A Patriot&#039;s Handbook, and see what she thinks, and where she is coming from, if you are interested.  Moynihan was no bargain, Clinton was worse, but now Caroline Kennedy is a threat to democracy? Please forgive me if you are all voting New Yorkers, as I&#039;m from PA, but to lay the failure of the bush dynasty at the feet of the Kennedys is complete and utter idiocy, &#039;Cervantes&#039;. They are polar opposites. By the way, I&#039;m not in the pay of the Kennedys; I work for a living. (Lisa, you go girl!  But what the heck is Dunamis?)  But whose pay are you people in?  (Hoser, I can&#039;t get a fix on you from your comments.) If Caroline Kennedy is supported by a majority of Democrats, and hence New Yorkers, how is there a problem for democracy if she is appointed?  I&#039;ve been paying attention politically for decades as a Democrat, and I love her and her family. She could be as great as Ted or Bobby, or her dad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear greg, Chris, Cervantes, and Doobie,</p>
<p>Yeah, Wikipedia is a real credible source.  Liz Holtzman seems to  me like the best candidate, and Mario Cuomo&#8217;s son Andrew may be second, but you could read Ms. Kennedy&#8217;s book, A Patriot&#8217;s Handbook, and see what she thinks, and where she is coming from, if you are interested.  Moynihan was no bargain, Clinton was worse, but now Caroline Kennedy is a threat to democracy? Please forgive me if you are all voting New Yorkers, as I&#8217;m from PA, but to lay the failure of the bush dynasty at the feet of the Kennedys is complete and utter idiocy, &#8216;Cervantes&#8217;. They are polar opposites. By the way, I&#8217;m not in the pay of the Kennedys; I work for a living. (Lisa, you go girl!  But what the heck is Dunamis?)  But whose pay are you people in?  (Hoser, I can&#8217;t get a fix on you from your comments.) If Caroline Kennedy is supported by a majority of Democrats, and hence New Yorkers, how is there a problem for democracy if she is appointed?  I&#8217;ve been paying attention politically for decades as a Democrat, and I love her and her family. She could be as great as Ted or Bobby, or her dad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkeptiSys</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/comment-page-1/#comment-20284</link>
		<dc:creator>SkeptiSys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/?p=3189#comment-20284</guid>
		<description>In case you missed it, the New York Times today published a Q&amp;A with Caroline Kennedy about her platform &#039;of sorts&#039;.  Her answers are so vague, it appears as though she feels revealing any position on important issues could only hurt her chances of election (er um, appointment).  
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/nyregion/21kennedy.html?_r=1&amp;hp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it, the New York Times today published a Q&amp;A with Caroline Kennedy about her platform &#8216;of sorts&#8217;.  Her answers are so vague, it appears as though she feels revealing any position on important issues could only hurt her chances of election (er um, appointment).<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/nyregion/21kennedy.html?_r=1&amp;hp" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/nyregion/21kennedy.html?_r=1&amp;hp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doobie</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/comment-page-1/#comment-20271</link>
		<dc:creator>Doobie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/?p=3189#comment-20271</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, brand names trump common sense in America. And in politics, &lt;i&gt;Kennedy&lt;/i&gt; is the top brand name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, brand names trump common sense in America. And in politics, <i>Kennedy</i> is the top brand name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/comment-page-1/#comment-20270</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/?p=3189#comment-20270</guid>
		<description>Greg: I certainly agree that &quot;if Patterson is going to appoint someone, he should appoint someone from one of New York’s local or national Congressional delegations.&quot;

There are some very qualified Congressional reps who are better known commodities and have demonstrated more commitment to serving New York than Ms. Kennedy.  Off hand, I can think of Maurice Hinchey who has been a voice in the wilderness on investigating Bush admin wrongdoings.  He started out in the state legislature where he was a great voice for upstate.  There&#039;s also Kirsten Gillibrand who just trounced her Republican opponent in a district custom gerrymandered for her 2006 Republican opponent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg: I certainly agree that &#8220;if Patterson is going to appoint someone, he should appoint someone from one of New York’s local or national Congressional delegations.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are some very qualified Congressional reps who are better known commodities and have demonstrated more commitment to serving New York than Ms. Kennedy.  Off hand, I can think of Maurice Hinchey who has been a voice in the wilderness on investigating Bush admin wrongdoings.  He started out in the state legislature where he was a great voice for upstate.  There&#8217;s also Kirsten Gillibrand who just trounced her Republican opponent in a district custom gerrymandered for her 2006 Republican opponent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/comment-page-1/#comment-20266</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/?p=3189#comment-20266</guid>
		<description>Well, I say Kennedy is &quot;likely&quot; to get the seat is because the only place I&#039;m seeing vocal disapproval on the left is in blogs. The Democratic mainstream has been either noncommittal on the notion of giving JFK&#039;s daughter the best Christmas present everor openly supportive (ie. Harry Reid). What&#039;s worse, there seems to be a dismissive notion towards critics of this prospective appointment that goes something like this :
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Well, yeah, political dynasties suck, but what&#039;s the big deal? Kennedy would just be replacing Bill Clinton&#039;s wife.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Which is, to say the least, incredibly disrespectful towards Clinton who, unlike Caroline Kennedy, was chosen twice by the people of New York to represent them. 

Personally, I wish they&#039;d have a special election and be done with it. At least then, if Caroline Kennedy ran for the office and won, her ascension would be the choice of the people of New York. Barring that, if Patterson is going to appoint someone, he should appoint someone from one of New York&#039;s local or national Congressional delegations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I say Kennedy is &#8220;likely&#8221; to get the seat is because the only place I&#8217;m seeing vocal disapproval on the left is in blogs. The Democratic mainstream has been either noncommittal on the notion of giving JFK&#8217;s daughter the best Christmas present everor openly supportive (ie. Harry Reid). What&#8217;s worse, there seems to be a dismissive notion towards critics of this prospective appointment that goes something like this :</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Well, yeah, political dynasties suck, but what&#8217;s the big deal? Kennedy would just be replacing Bill Clinton&#8217;s wife.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Which is, to say the least, incredibly disrespectful towards Clinton who, unlike Caroline Kennedy, was chosen twice by the people of New York to represent them. </p>
<p>Personally, I wish they&#8217;d have a special election and be done with it. At least then, if Caroline Kennedy ran for the office and won, her ascension would be the choice of the people of New York. Barring that, if Patterson is going to appoint someone, he should appoint someone from one of New York&#8217;s local or national Congressional delegations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoser</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/comment-page-1/#comment-20265</link>
		<dc:creator>hoser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/?p=3189#comment-20265</guid>
		<description>Please explain how you arrive at your conclusion that &quot;she’s likely to be the next Senator from New York.&quot;
As a New Yorker, I agree with the sentiment that there are other, better qualified candidates.  I think, however, that you should reflect on your rhetoric, and examine your conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please explain how you arrive at your conclusion that &#8220;she’s likely to be the next Senator from New York.&#8221;<br />
As a New Yorker, I agree with the sentiment that there are other, better qualified candidates.  I think, however, that you should reflect on your rhetoric, and examine your conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cervantes</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/comment-page-1/#comment-20264</link>
		<dc:creator>Cervantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/?p=3189#comment-20264</guid>
		<description>Hah! Board members don&#039;t do squat.  They are tools of the Executive Director.  Her job on boards was fundraising, period.  She&#039;s a successful fundraiser because she&#039;s a celebrity in high society and people pay to go to her parties.  That&#039;s her experience. 

This &quot;Lisa&quot; character is obviously on her payroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah! Board members don&#8217;t do squat.  They are tools of the Executive Director.  Her job on boards was fundraising, period.  She&#8217;s a successful fundraiser because she&#8217;s a celebrity in high society and people pay to go to her parties.  That&#8217;s her experience. </p>
<p>This &#8220;Lisa&#8221; character is obviously on her payroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cervantes</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/comment-page-1/#comment-20262</link>
		<dc:creator>Cervantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/?p=3189#comment-20262</guid>
		<description>I certainly agree. While we had a long way to go on July 4, 1776 before we had a real democracy, one thing that was absolutely clear back then was that the whole point of declaring independence and undertaking a war to secure it was to free ourselves of the hereditary aristocracy.  Where the hell does this impulse come from to restore it?

Another Kennedy, a total airhead named Max, declared himself a candidate to be my Representative a few years back.  The first time he tried to give a press conference and speak in public, he revealed himself to be such a blithering idiot that he was forced to withdraw.  Hurray.  But Caroline isn&#039;t even being put to that test.  This is ridiculous, outrageous, offensive, and completely contrary to the basic values we pretend that our polity is based on.

And for her to actively pursue the appointment, to assume that her name entitles her to a Senate seat, ought to be disqualifying in itself.

Yuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree. While we had a long way to go on July 4, 1776 before we had a real democracy, one thing that was absolutely clear back then was that the whole point of declaring independence and undertaking a war to secure it was to free ourselves of the hereditary aristocracy.  Where the hell does this impulse come from to restore it?</p>
<p>Another Kennedy, a total airhead named Max, declared himself a candidate to be my Representative a few years back.  The first time he tried to give a press conference and speak in public, he revealed himself to be such a blithering idiot that he was forced to withdraw.  Hurray.  But Caroline isn&#8217;t even being put to that test.  This is ridiculous, outrageous, offensive, and completely contrary to the basic values we pretend that our polity is based on.</p>
<p>And for her to actively pursue the appointment, to assume that her name entitles her to a Senate seat, ought to be disqualifying in itself.</p>
<p>Yuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thetalentshow.org/2008/12/16/who-the-hell-is-caroline-kennedy/comment-page-1/#comment-20261</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetalentshow.org/?p=3189#comment-20261</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t nepotism.  It&#039;s worse than that.  It&#039;s dynastic politics.  Apparently, the failure to teach us that this is a bankrupt concept should also be added to the (amazingly) still-growing list of failures of the second Bush administration.

It&#039;s also very discouraging that polls indicate that Kennedy is actually supported by a majority of Democrats in New York (and, hence a majority of NY voters).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t nepotism.  It&#8217;s worse than that.  It&#8217;s dynastic politics.  Apparently, the failure to teach us that this is a bankrupt concept should also be added to the (amazingly) still-growing list of failures of the second Bush administration.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also very discouraging that polls indicate that Kennedy is actually supported by a majority of Democrats in New York (and, hence a majority of NY voters).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
