No on Gonzales

I’m joining Kos and others on this one :

Unprecedented times call for unprecedented actions. In this case, we, the undersigned bloggers, have decided to speak as one and collectively author a document of opposition. We oppose the nomination of Alberto Gonzales to the position of Attorney General of the United States, and we urge every United States Senator to vote against him.

As the prime legal architect for the policy of torture adopted by the Bush Administration, Gonzales’s advice led directly to the abandonment of longstanding federal laws, the Geneva Convention, and the United States Constitution itself. Our country, in following Gonzales’s legal opinions, has forsaken its commitment to human rights and the rule of law and shamed itself before the world with our conduct at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib. The United States, a nation founded on respect for law and human rights, should not have as its Attorney General the architect of the law’s undoing.

In January 2002, Gonzales advised the President that the United States Constitution does not apply to his actions as Commander in Chief, and thus the President could declare the Geneva Conventions inoperative. Gonzales’s endorsement of the August 2002 Bybee/Yoo Memorandum approved a definition of torture so vague and evasive as to declare it nonexistent. Most shockingly, he has embraced the unacceptable view that the President has the power to ignore the Constitution, laws duly enacted by Congress and International treaties duly ratified by the United States. He has called the Geneva Conventions “quaint.”

Legal opinions at the highest level have grave consequences. What were the consequences of Gonzales’s actions? The policies for which Gonzales provided a cover of legality - views which he expressly reasserted in his senate confirmation hearings - inexorably led to abuses that have undermined military discipline and the moral authority our nation once carried. His actions led directly to documented violations at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo and widespread abusive conduct in locales around the world.

Michael Posner of Human Rights First observed: “After the horrific images from Abu Ghraib became public last year, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld insisted that the world should ‘judge us by our actions [and] watch how a democracy deals with the wrongdoing and with scandal and the pain of acknowledging and correcting our own mistakes.’” We agree. It is because of this that we believe the only proper course of action is for the senate to reject Alberto Gonzales’s nomination for Attorney General. As Posner notes, “[t]he world is indeed watching.” Will the senate condone torture? Will the senate condone the rejection of the rule of law?

With this nomination, we have arrived at a crossroads as a nation. Now is the time for all citizens of conscience to stand up and take responsibility for what the world saw, and, truly, much that we have not seen, at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere. We oppose the confirmation of Alberto Gonzales as Attorney General of the United States, and we urge the senate to reject him.

I don’t think the Dems should be “obstructionists” (by which I mean opposing the Republicans out of spite), but this is an extraordinary circumstance which will speak volumes about our country’s commitment to human rights and the rule of law. It’s time for an “accountability moment”.


posted by greg on January 25, 2005 @ 1:37 pm

4 comments

  1. I don’t think the Dems should be “obstructionists” (by which I mean opposing the Republicans out of spite)

    Oh, I think that sounds like a fine idea. Give them a taste of what we went through starting in 1992, and don’t stop, ever. If republicans propose that the earth revolves around the sun, oppose it because those snake tongued warmongering liars said so. If a republican tells us his name, demand identification, just to make sure he isn’t a lying, warmongering jerk like everyone else in his party.

    Ahem.

    I do see your point. Dang it.

    Comment by Ross A Lincoln — January 25, 2005 @ 3:31 pm

  2. Say, “No” To Gonzales

    70 Blogs and counting agree with Armando’s call to say, “No” to Gonzales. After reading his post, I can’t believe it isn’t more. As the prime legal architect for the policy of torture adopted by the Bush Administration, Gonzales’s advice…

    Trackback by Rooftop Report — January 25, 2005 @ 4:29 pm

  3. We oppose Gonzales

    Quoting from No on Gonzales: Unprecedented times call for unprecedented actions. In this case, we, the undersigned bloggers, have decided to speak as one and collectively author a document of opposition. We oppose the nomination of Alberto Gonzales to …

    Trackback by Edgewise — January 25, 2005 @ 11:29 pm

  4. We oppose Gonzales

    We are against torture. The Gonzales nomination may be ineluctable but we would like to go on record as opposing it. In the future we want people to know that not everyone in the U.S. made excuses for atrocities. Quoting…

    Trackback by Edgewise — January 28, 2005 @ 3:37 pm

Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.